Do you know a child in the seventh grade? Ask her to give you a peek at her biology text book. This stuff is really pretty basic. It's so basic that you're embarrassing yourself.
- Status
No offense, but it sounds to me like you didn't make it to the seventh grade. If you had, maybe you could recite it verb and verse.
Maybe _CY_ is like me. When I was in the seventh grade, it was the school year 1959-1960. The intricacies of DNA weren't taught back then.
Woody
Last edited:
that's total horseshit! details for mRNA vaccines gets deep quick.
if it's so simple why don't you come up with actual evidence that supports mRNA vaccines NOT effecting our DNA.
especially coming from someone that's not produced a single piece of actual evidence that I'm aware of ... ha ha ha
I'm convinced either all of y'alls Google is broke, or you're all so dead set in your politicized positions and afraid of proving your own selves wrong.
We live in a time where all information is available at any time, but science isn't always believed and debunked on its own merit. People base their beliefs on politics and their guts. I know this because I too spent decades denying climate change, and when I shared the hard scientific data that opened my eyes here, it was denied even though it was logically, scientifically conclusive. If Newt had adopted climate change,, we'd all be on board with it because politics always trumps science.
We live in a time where all information is available at any time, but science isn't always believed and debunked on its own merit. People base their beliefs on politics and their guts. I know this because I too spent decades denying climate change, and when I shared the hard scientific data that opened my eyes here, it was denied even though it was logically, scientifically conclusive. If Newt had adopted climate change,, we'd all be on board with it because politics always trumps science.
Try reading a basic Microbiology book?
Ok, here’s one from researcher Dr. Forster. It’s written for laymen & easy to understand. If you want to get into grad level research citations, they are available as well.
Aren’t you guys embarrassed by the simplistic & easily disprovable claims you bring up? However, do the politicians use this pandemic for partisan ends & violate our rights? Of course. I’ll agree with you on that. But doubting basic science won’t fly.
The antivaxxer & covid conspiracy topics really don’t serve you well among the readers. You don’t have to be afraid of evidence based medicine.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/victor...ant-alter-your-dna-heres-why/?sh=6f09dc824911
here’s another. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
Last edited:
yes please do provide grad level doc's .. preferably doc's that's been peer reviewed by well known organizations like Nature, BMJ, New England Journal of Medicine, etc. etc.
sorry articles from forbes and CDC doesn't do it for me.
articles from CDC are sooo slanted it's on auto reject.
perhaps that's a bit harsh on CDC, but they have earned it.
Last edited:
Don't need "grad level docs" to prove mRNA in this case doesn't penetrate the Nucleus of our cells. That's taught in High School level science.
The media went all bonkers about it causing blindness and death. Incessant rants about how dangerous it was to be prescribed during this entire covid after Trump took it.
You work in a bubble where it may have been prescribed but nationwide thousands of people were denied it by the medical profession.
My VA physician has refused to prescribe it to those with early symptoms saying he couldn't.
The drug was actually banned in some states.
The godlike Fauchi even went on the bandwagon stating it was dangerous.
The nation's top infectious disease expert says data indicates hydroxychloroquine is potentially dangerous for COVID-19 patients.
https://news.yahoo.com/fauci-says-hydroxychloroquine-not-effective-185200774.html
CNN anchor accused of 'ludicrous' claim about hydroxychloroquine by Yale epidemiology professor
Keilar spars with Trump campaign spokesman, says hydroxychloroquine 'kills people'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-anchor-keilar-ludicrous-claim-hydroxychloroquine
During a heated exchange with Trump Campaign Communications Director Tim Murtaugh this week, CNN Anchor Brianna Keiler claimed hydroxychloroquine, a decades old malaria drug, "kills people."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...-lies-about-hydroxychloroquine-again-n2572997
I could go on forever with liberal rants about how dangerous that cocktail of drugs were considered in Trumps term in office, but those same stations and news outlets are now saying its safe and ok to use. That was my point. Here is proof.
In an abrupt about-face, the Ohio Board of Pharmacy and governor of Minnesota have recently retracted their decisions to ban the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 patients. As the saying goes, it’s better late than never.
For mostly political reasons, hydroxychloroquine has become a highly controversial drug. Ever since President Trump voiced his support for the drug as a viable treatment for coronavirus, the liberal mainstream media has gone berserk and have done all in their power to discredit hydroxychloroquine.
https://townhall.com/columnists/chr...e-retracting-hydroxychloroquine-bans-n2575161
- Status
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ninth Circuit: Felon Has ‘Right to Possess Firearm for Self-Defense’- Latest: Fredkrueger100
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
