I'm with Mickey on this one. Being a harley rider and a non drinker, and a ccw holder.
I'm with Mickey on this one. Being a harley rider and a non drinker, and a ccw holder.
Well if the tats don't do it the record will.
2001-96 OTTA Possession Of Cds Within 1000 Ft Park Or School (Rss) 06/13/2003 4Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 07/28/2006
2003-332 OTTA Driving A Motor Vehicle While Under The Influence Of Drugs 05/18/2004 4Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 03/06/2006
2004-33 OTTA Possession Of Controlled Substance 05/18/2004 10Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 05/17/2008
2004-33 OTTA Manufacture Of Cds (Split) 05/18/2004 10Y 0M 0D Probation 05/18/2004 05/17/2024
2004-33 OTTA Maintain Place Resorted To By Users Of Controlled Drugs 05/18/2004 5Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 06/14/2006
2004-33 OTTA Manufacture Of Cds (Split) 05/18/2004 10Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 05/17/2008
2001-196B OTTA Poss/Cds 1000' School/Park/Child (50%) 4 Y SUSPENDED 06/13/2003 06/12/2007
2004-33A OTTA Poss Of Controlled Substance 13.98 Y SUSPENDED 05/18/2004 05/08/2018
2004-33A OTTA Manufacture Of Cds 13.98 Y SUSPENDED 05/18/2004 05/08/2018
2004-33A OTTA Maint Place For Keeping/Selling Cds
2001-96 OTTA Possession Of Cds Within 1000 Ft Park Or School (Rss) 06/13/2003 4Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 07/28/2006
2003-332 OTTA Driving A Motor Vehicle While Under The Influence Of Drugs 05/18/2004 4Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 03/06/2006
2004-33 OTTA Possession Of Controlled Substance 05/18/2004 10Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 05/17/2008
2004-33 OTTA Manufacture Of Cds (Split) 05/18/2004 10Y 0M 0D Probation 05/18/2004 05/17/2024
2004-33 OTTA Maintain Place Resorted To By Users Of Controlled Drugs 05/18/2004 5Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 06/14/2006
2004-33 OTTA Manufacture Of Cds (Split) 05/18/2004 10Y 0M 0D Incarceration 09/15/2004 05/17/2008
2001-196B OTTA Poss/Cds 1000' School/Park/Child (50%) 4 Y SUSPENDED 06/13/2003 06/12/2007
2004-33A OTTA Poss Of Controlled Substance 13.98 Y SUSPENDED 05/18/2004 05/08/2018
2004-33A OTTA Manufacture Of Cds 13.98 Y SUSPENDED 05/18/2004 05/08/2018
2004-33A OTTA Maint Place For Keeping/Selling Cds
I figure you're joking, but for those that may not know the lingo, it's possession of a controlled dangerous substance.
If these guys presented themselves in a hostile manner and looked like the one in the mug shot (racist/gang related tattoo visible), I'd probably preemptively draw down on them. Guess that's just the LEO in me talking though. Life's too short to let scumbags like this feel powerful in picking a 2 on 1 fight that might leave you in the hospital or worse.
I find it interesting that the news called it a road rage incident. This outwardly appears to be two scumbag druggie losers who wanted to pick a fight. That they happened to be on a public roadway at the time does not in itself qualify this as a road rage incident.
Not to start anything or muddy the waters, but how does "stand your ground" play into this? Does it not apply?
Getting into a fist fight is risky business. I've seen too many fights that turned into the losing party either losing their life or ending up disabled for life to take that chance.
No offense, but in my opinion, these days, there is no such thing as a butt kickin'. Anyone who is willing to use physical violence against me in any form- solo, paired, gang, weapon or not, I am going to respond however I need to in order to guarantee my safety.
A punch or kick can easily lead to the same result as a hit from a bat or a bullet from an assailant's gun. If I get knocked unconscious, I am at the mercy of an attacker who may very well cause me severe bodily harm or even kill me as I lay defenseless. Thus, I feel I am justified in using deadly force if necessary to stave off even an unarmed attack from a single attacker if they attack me.
It sure as hell should. A brother has a right to pull over and add a quart to his harley about anywhere. In all seriousness, I don't know why it shouldn't. To me it looks like he did everything right.
+1, especially with two drunks who followed you just for that purpose.
It's my understanding (which could very well be wrong) that it applies to you anywhere you have the legal right to be. But from some of the statements in this thread maybe it's something else?
I really hate that the last line of the article calls it a homicide.
Similar threads
