A line has been crossed

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

dyabolical

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
Location
Vinita
http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_n...e=outbrain&utm_content=outbrain&quick_picks=1

I am speechless.

You think you've heard it all until I tell you that an appeals court in Illinois recently ruled that a woman is allowed to sue a dead teen's estate for injuries caused by his flying body parts. The 18-year-old boy was running across the Amtrak tracks to catch another train but didn't make it -- he was hit by an oncoming train going 70 mph and his body was torn apart by the force and flung onto a nearby passengers' waiting platform. The woman, 58, was struck by a sizable chunk of the boy's body and was knocked to the ground, breaking her leg and wrist. The court ruled that the boy's death was "reasonably foreseeable" and that his estate can be held responsible for his negligence.

I'm sorry, but who goes around suing a dead teen whose body was ripped to shreds in one of the most gruesome ways imaginable?

I can't say that my first or even fiftieth instinct after being pummeled to the ground by half of a bloody torso would be to raise my fist in the air and declare that whoever had the nerve to let their body explode and land on me will most certainly pay in court. Even if my leg was shattered, I still can't imagine going after the dead teen's estate.

The family of the deceased has suffered enough -- their son was blasted by a train. It doesn't get much worse than that. And to think that they have to endure a woman nitpicking her way into their bank accounts is disgusting. It's not like this kid had millions -- what is she hoping to gain from this lawsuit?

It won't make her leg any better. I can't imagine it'd help her heal in any way, shape, or form. I don't think a normal person would feel good about suing for injuries caused by a dead teen's flying body parts. Yeah, he did something incredibly stupid, but I think he paid the price. He's dead. His body was blown to bits. No need to drive the point home with what seems like a frivolous, greedy, and hurtful lawsuit.

If you were in the injured woman's shoes, would you sue, too?
 

MoBoost

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,292
Reaction score
14
Location
Midwest City
Sad and gruesome story ... I don't see how kids death clears his estate/insurance from responsibility. Let's say it's a traffic accident, and the kid flies through red light, t-bones me and crushes my pelvis; he/she also manages to kill themselves in the progress. It's as sad as it gets, but I believe their insurance/estate should be responsible for my damages.
 

JB Books

Shooter Emeritus
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
14,111
Reaction score
190
Location
Hansenland
You wouldn't have been speechless if it were your mother.

THIS is exactly the type of post I laugh about. you guys always think something bad is going to happen to the "other guy," never to you or yours. so, you drink the Kool Aid of tort reform, etc.

When the Hell will you wake and realize YOU are tghe "OTHER GUY?"

Just look at what has happened to some folks we know here on the board.
 

Bigjoe.45

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
769
Reaction score
2
Location
Yukon
I think I am guilty of hearing "law suit" and thinking the worst. It was not the ladies fault, but it is sad for the kids family. This one is a lose/lose deal.
 

Shoot Summ

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Messages
6,276
Reaction score
1,387
Location
Tulsa
OK, I'll bite since I am the resident ass today.

So you are 58, near retirement, limited income, some health insurance and out of nowhere body parts hit you causing about $150K in hospital bills that completely wipe out any savings you have.

Do you?

A) Bend over and take it

B) Try to recover your expenses from the party that was responsible for the flying body parts.
 

Mr.357Sig

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
3,735
Reaction score
88
Location
BA
I have no problem with her suing the boy's estate. I'd do the same.

The woman was minding her own business and was injured because of the reckless actions of the boy.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom