What did he get wrong? Don't leave us hanging like that.
I need to clarify - he omitted the first item, and got the second wrong. The timeline of the ATF’s actions regarding their pistol brace rule was the first; Colion didn’t mention the third letter to SB Tactical “clarifying” the ATF’s original position on pistol braces. That is, pistol braces were fine as in their original letter, after two years of saying they were definitely not OK. The second item was that during the 120 day period this past spring, he said people registering their pistol braces would have to pay a $200 tax stamp, which the ATF had actually waived in an attempt to circumvent the “financial harm” clause that would have weakened their position.