Free speech on this forum or against each other is not a Right. By the way, I am an expert at Rights. Nice debate, I do not hold anything against anyone that feels a need to defend their belief, even if we disagree.
No, it was a sincere commit.Lol... condescend much?
Ah dude, are you high?
"I do not hold anything against anyone that feels a need to defend their belief" ...
"Anyone that feels a need to defend their belief" doesn't sound condescending to you?
Warning - Rude To Another Member
No, it merely means that I do not have to agree with you to respect your opinion. I feel that you are being a teenage girl trying to start at fight. By the way, what you are doing is an ad homonym, even if you do not have the intelligence enough to understand your argument(I do).
:
Personally, I think those that want to do their "auditing," whether it be for 1A or 2A reasons or any other, are just maybe a step or a half-step below the "sovereign citizens." In almost every case, they seem to be trying to provoke encounters with authority, mostly to get themselves "known" on YouTube.
A wrong encounter could put them in a grave where there is no YouTube to watch.
A wrong encounter could put them in a grave where there is no YouTube to watch.
Ad hominems appear to be tricky. Sometimes a fella may speak ad hominem without noticing it. Then sometimes one can speak ad hominem bout someone speaking ad hominem. Now my brain hurts.
Lol, well... at least you can spell it.
