Border Patrol Union Pres. warns cartels will have complete control over border after Title 42 ends

[Snattlerake]

What I want to know and have been searching for the answer for a well over a year now, is why in the hell haven't impeachment articles been filed for Joe Biden? How is this not impeachable? I get that the Senate won't play ball, but why just shrug your shoulders and say "oh well"? Dems have no problem impeaching Trump on completely illegitimate and BS grounds, but the repukes won't even go there when they have good reason and a duty to do so? WTF?

I'm going to answer the obvious, because somehow it is benefiting them politically or financially.

 

[Snattlerake]

Never make it through the senate. Why waste the time?
Even more criminal activity by pedo joe. News reports are coming out that the FBI is holding evidence of biden openly taking bribes from a foreign government that has been revealed by a high value whistleblower from that agency.
A subpoena has been issued for those documents.

We will see the documents after an extremely slow walk during the 59th president's administration.

 

[dennishoddy]

We will see the documents after an extremely slow walk during the 59th president's administration.

And will be heavily redacted like the JFK assassination files that were released after 50 years so the complicity of the federal government in that assassination won't be exposed.

 

[Seadog]

President of National Border Patrol Council Brandon Judd warns that once Title 42 is lifted, the cartels are going to have complete control over the southern border.

"Once Title 42 goes away and the explosion happens, they're going to control our entire southwest border," Judd said on the Wednesday edition of the "Just the News, No Noise" TV show. "When they do that, that's when [the cartels] are going to be able to bring in all of their products such as the fentanyl, the dangerous drugs, the criminal aliens, and the aliens from special interest countries. All of that is going to go up and it's going to be Americans that are going to pay for it."

The Biden administration approved the temporary deployment of 1,500 active-duty troops to the southern border earlier this week to assist the U.S. Border Patrol before the expiration of Title 42, a public health authority that allowed the U.S. to quickly deport asylum-seekers to contain the spread of COVID.

Judd explained how the border patrol is going to have even more limited resources than they already do after the ceasing of Title 42.

"If we're apprehending 3,000 people, that means that we have about 70% of our resources on the border," he stated. "If we're apprehending 5,000 people, then we have about 50% of our resources on the border. Right now we're apprehending 7,700 people every single day. That means only about 35 to 40% of our resources are on the border. Once that number goes up even more, once Title 42 goes away, we're going to be down to about 10% of our resources."

Judd said he expects the numbers of illegals crossing the border to go up by the thousands.

"It's a minimum of 11,000," he explained. "But we could see up to 16,000. It just depends on how the cartels go out and advertise their services. If the cartels are very aggressive in advertising their services, that number could go up to 16,000. But we will see a minimum of 11,000 people per day."

The lifting of Title 42 follows the violent killing of five last week in Texas. The suspect in the attack is 39-year-old Francisco Oropesa, an illegal immigrant who had been deported four times. According to an ABC source, he was deported twice in 2009, once in 2012 and again in 2016.

Judd called out White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre for not acknowledging Oropesa's immigration status during a press conference, but making the situation all about guns.

"When she gave a briefing on it, she never even mentioned that this person was in the country illegally," he said. "All she tried to do was make it all about guns. When are we going to learn that criminals do not care about the laws? You can have the strictest laws that there are and criminals are going to violate that law. That doesn't matter. What we could have controlled is we could have controlled his immigration status. We could have prosecuted him each time he crossed the border illegally and we didn't."

https://justthenews.com/government/...artels-will-have-complete-control-over-border

It seems like a good time to declare war on Mexico and Democrats. Two birds, one stone. And a lot of our problems would be gone.

 

[SoonerP226]

What I want to know and have been searching for the answer for a well over a year now, is why in the hell haven't impeachment articles been filed for Joe Biden? How is this not impeachable?

What do you think he is doing in this regard that's impeachable? I think he's bungling the border crisis just like he bungled every other major situation during his administration, but I don't know what he's doing that is actually impeachable.

 

[dennishoddy]

What do you think he is doing in this regard that's impeachable? I think he's bungling the border crisis just like he bungled every other major situation during his administration, but I don't know what he's doing that is actually impeachable.

It's the influence peddling, Quid Pro Qo and possibly some outright bribery that a high value whistleblower has brought out today. The FBI is sitting on it just like the hunter laptop, knowing there are crimes involved but refuse to move forward with the evidence.

 

[Seadog]

What do you think he is doing in this regard that's impeachable? I think he's bungling the border crisis just like he bungled every other major situation during his administration, but I don't know what he's doing that is actually impeachable.

Protecting the US border and Americans is the primary job of Congress and the president. Letting in millions of illegals that are draining Americans tax dollars on fraudulent asylum claims and prioritizing illegals over American citizens, sounds like reason enough to impeach the senile piece of shite

 

[okietool]

It seems like a good time to declare war on Mexico and Democrats. Two birds, one stone. And a lot of our problems would be gone.

Annex Mexico send n the democrats.
Same stone with a property gain.

 

[SoonerP226]

It's the influence peddling, Quid Pro Qo and possibly some outright bribery that a high value whistleblower has brought out today.

OK, that sounds impeachable. If they have credible evidence, they should draw up articles of impeachment; even if it goes nowhere in the Senate, it'll put the Dems on the record trying to protect a corrupt politician.

 

[Shadowrider]

What do you think he is doing in this regard that's impeachable? I think he's bungling the border crisis just like he bungled every other major situation during his administration, but I don't know what he's doing that is actually impeachable.

@Seadog at post #17 pretty much nails the crux of it. He swore to enforce the laws of the land and he has absolutely refused to do so. It's actually even worse, he's intentionally created this crisis for political gain and lied to the public about it for his entire term. Giving him all credit possible, it's the clearest case of dereliction of duty than I can comprehend. If that's not impeachable what is?