What's missing? Facts. Objectivity. Case Studies. Zero academic writing. Zero actual cases of a prosecution for using handloads/reloads. Zero laws or rules governing reloads in any use. Nothing. Just the above listed points. I am still looking though.
That is not to say I don't carry factory ammo. I carry the most effective FLEA 9ball in all my 9s. It's expensive too but it's effective. I only carry 230gr factory ball in my .45...no HP or fanciness. It's equalized situations for over 100yrs and is cheap, accurate, and effective. But I will use whatever's is at hand as long as it's legal, and reloads are legal.
That's also why we have lawyers and the right to STFU. All these "scenarios" written include some dummy who doesn't know how to use a lawyer and the 5A.
On a forum, which was full of all the points I listed including his yap about Bias. Wikipedia is a more reliable source than a forum.I gave you an attorneys opinion and mentioned where handloads have at the very least caused issues with the defense (NH V Bias, TN V Barnes), and 1 where the prosecutor flat said "factory ammo wasnt deadly enough for the defendant (SD shooter)" NJ V Kennedy
Link?U.C. Berkeley did a big study on this very thing, and their finding was under no circumstance should reloads be used for self defence. The study went on to say that no ammunition should be used in self defence nor should any firearm or impact weapon, knife, or anything. It went on to say don't look your assailant in the eye and just do exactly as they say and you might be fine. It might not be exactly what your looking for, but it was a scholarly paper written about reloads!
That's good. That's like Benny Hinn telling me to repent.Massad Ayoob said always carry the same ammo that law enforcement carries, no lawyer can fault you over the kind of ammo you used in a defensive shooting
Enter your email address to join: