What most people seem to forget, the Clinton thing was NOT about his affairs but about his corruption. His affairs only came into it when he got caught lying to congress.
I didn't forget that. But the very fact that he was asked about sexual acts under oath is akin to what's going on here. That is what opened the whole crapstorm. It THEN transcended into the legal equivalent of a witch hunt, based almost entirely on his infidelity.
And Newt was at the forefront.
I'm not pointing fingers or saying it is or isn't appropriate to ask those kinds of questions. Just pointing out the hypocrisy of many people currently flowing with the Newt-mentum.
Last edited: