Glock's-manual safety

[PanhandleGlocker]

"Otherwise, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 guns are great, and come with a thumb safety option, which is why I personally went with M&P over Glock for a couple purchases."

It's my current CC. .45.
Just never could get over a loaded Glock, and others, in single action, being in someone else's hands.
That scenario shouldn't happen but...............

Eh. Just carry without one in the chamber.

 

[conditionzero]

Ok. You asked for it. It's that 6lb. pull without a thumb safety that gets me.
watch

Not following proper firearm safety can get ya hurt...

 

[GC7]

Overpriced plastic trash guns.

 

[conditionzero]

Overpriced plastic trash guns.

Saving the planet!

 

[Waltercat]

Overpriced plastic trash guns.

LOL Now you started it.

 

[PanhandleGlocker]

Overpriced plastic trash guns.

That sounds like something a grackle would say.

 

[Randy_]

Not following proper firearm safety can get ya hurt...

The "Glocks don't need manual safeties" argument has always struck me the same as arguing "My car doesn't need seat belts or airbags, because it won't run into a tree by itself."

 

[Waltercat]

And we've all seen this. Doubt this would have happened with thumb safety. At least you could set it while dancing. It's what I do.
watch

 

[conditionzero]

The "Glocks don't need manual safeties" argument has always struck me the same as arguing "My car doesn't need seat belts or airbags, because it won't run into a tree by itself."

I mean, that is completely different. Another GLOCK isn't going to hit your GLOCK and fire it.

 

[OK Corgi Rancher]

The "Glocks don't need manual safeties" argument has always struck me the same as arguing "My car doesn't need seat belts or airbags, because it won't run into a tree by itself."

Not the same...

If someone shoots you the manual safety on your gun isn't going to protect you.

If someone in another vehicle runs into you, seatbelts and airbags will likely offer you some protection.