Harvard Student Faces Eviction(MAGA Hat)--Room Ransacked for (Legal) Guns

[RugersGR8]

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018...daily&utm_content=links&utm_campaign=20181130
Harvard Student Faces Eviction After Roommates Saw MAGA Hat, Ransacked Her Room for (Legal) Guns
Tom Ciccotta 30 Nov 2018

 

[TerryMiller]

Go to snowflake college, expect to meet snowflakes.

However, good for her for standing her ground. After finals, she ought to give them fits for what they did. Maybe even make them move out.

 

[RugersGR8]

Go to snowflake college, expect to meet snowflakes.

However, good for her for standing her ground. After finals, she ought to give them fits for what they did. Maybe even make them move out.

Take them to court! Illegal search & profiling comes to my mind as possible reasons to do so.

 

[Dave70968]

Take them to court! Illegal search & profiling comes to my mind as possible reasons to do so.

I didn't see anything in there about the police conducting the search.

 

[dennishoddy]

That's pretty insane. An off campus residence and they saw a MAGA hat, then searched her private property without her permission.
I'm not sure there is a law against that, but the law of respecting someone's personal space in a community space certainly comes to mind.
I wish she would have had one and they "confiscated" it. Then we have a crime.

 

[RugersGR8]

I didn't see anything in there about the police conducting the search.

I agree. But as dennishoddy said, they(roomies/neighbors) searched her property without her permission because they saw the MAGA hat(profiling)---that was the point I was trying to make(not very well though).

 

[Dave70968]

I agree. But as dennishoddy said, they(roomies/neighbors) searched her property without her permission because they saw the MAGA hat(profiling)---that was the point I was trying to make(not very well though).

Ah. The charges you specified are specific to government agents (and at least the "illegal search" is grounds for exclusion of evidence in a criminal proceeding, not necessarily a lawsuit). The civil suit against a private actor would likely be in trespass (specifically, trespass to chattels, which is improperly exercising dominion over the personal property of another).

 

[okie362]

I'd think a good old fashioned ass whoopin would be in order though?

 

[SMS]

Jesus, drama much? What a ridiculous story. Notice they didn't even say that she actually had guns? People read this crap and consider it "news and information"?

 

[bigred1]

I'd think a good old fashioned ass whoopin would be in order though?

I agree. Fisticuffs has kept a few men out of my business. But I'm not that way anymore.