This does smell like a trap ...
Since the someone you mention would be registering an AR pistol with a brace as a short barreled rifle, I don't think it would matter. It is not the "brace" that is being registered-- the SBR is.I wonder if someone goes through the eforms process will the ATF ultimately want pictures to verify the use of a brace and add some stipulation that you can't put on a stock after you get the stamp.
True, but I figured they'd want their pound of flesh if you add the stock since they gave you a "free" stamp with conditions, etc.Since the someone you mention would be registering an AR pistol with a brace as a short barreled rifle, I don't think it would matter. It is not the "brace" that is being registered-- the SBR is.
Anyone see sheriff Tommy Johnson’s post on the sheriffs FB page concerning braces?
He's instructed his deputies not to enforce anything related to the brace rule unless the AR pistol is in use during a crime. If they encounter someone with an AR pistol equipped with a brace during a traffic stop they won't be enforcing or checking anything. They also won't participate in confiscation activities if ATF moves in that direction.Don’t have FB, what was his basic message?
He's instructed his deputies not to enforce anything related to the brace rule unless the AR pistol is in use during a crime. If they encounter someone with an AR pistol equipped with a brace during a traffic stop they won't be enforcing or checking anything. They also won't participate in confiscation activities if ATF moves in that direction.
My guess is that this will be case for many state and local agencies. They aren’t going to enforce the ATF ruling unless you’re caught in the act of some other serious crime.
Many sheriff departments in Illinois are saying that they won't enforce that state's new AR ban. Last I heard, something 88% of the sheriffs in the state are refusing.
Enter your email address to join: