I'd go ahead and get one. I have four as of right now M4gery, A4gery, 6.8 halfway MK12 clone, A2 style. Which reminds me i need more 6.8 mags.
That's okay, I found them cheaper online.Yep, we just sold out. Sorry.
If you have the funds..and can do it with out missing rent...why wait for the next Sandy Hook.. there are a lot budget AR's out there for 600'ish.. most AR's are mill-spec so aside from names you should expect at least a military acceptable standard of quality...
The direct impingement gas system wasn't meant to be used in a carbine...if you want something with AK-like reliability in a carbine then get a Sig 556 swat patrol. If you still want the AR platform, then get a Sig 516...yes, these rifles will cost twice as much but for the reason you are undoubtedly buying it for, reliability is worth something vs something you can't stop and clean every few hundred rounds (high-maintenance). Something that will go bang for thousands of rounds without cleaning is better insurance; both of the rifles I mentioned above can do that.
torture tests begin about 6min into the vid for those who r in a hurry
However, if I was going to try and get an off-the-shelf AR carbine in a low-mid price range, I'd probably be considering Windham Weaponry; Academy used to carry them for about 800sh bux.
Not trying to argue or be a "know it all", but most AR's are not mil-spec. A lot of the budget rifles use 4140 steel and non-chrome-lined barrels (mil-spec calls for 4150 steel and chrome lining). Most budget AR's use 6061 aluminum for the receiver extension (mil-spec calls for 7075). Most budget AR's use Bolts that are randomly tested (1 in 10) or not tested at all (mil-spec calls for all Bolts to be magnafluxed and high-pressure tested).
Unless you run your AR very hard, that vast majority of us will probably never see any difference between a true mil-spec AR and a budget brand. I believe that is the point you were trying to make.
Enter your email address to join: