Is it legal to carry on private property? I was always under the impression it was, however in a different thread I heard otherwise. LightningCrash cited the following:
If this is true, how is it legal to shoot targets on your own private land, as so many do? One certainly has to carry in order to shoot.
Surely this case law is negated by further case law or statute, right? If not, this seems a blatant infringement of the 2nd A. If I can't keep and bear on my own property, then where??
see Fritz Pierce v State
Pierce v State also found that a pistol was not part of the state's RKBA
http://www.loislaw.com/livepublish8923/doclink.htp?alias=OKCASE&cite=275+P.+393
A more recent case, Gilio v State, reviews Open Carry a bit and does not overturn Pierce, but affirms it.
http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw...=eeCN.Gjea.aadj.edCN&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW
"As the law now is in this state, a person may lawfully own and possess any of the weapons named in sections 1991, 1992, [pistols and revolvers] and may move such weapons from room to room in their place of residence, but may not wear them on their person and transport them about the yard as shown by the evidence to have been done by the defendant in this case. 42 Okla. Crim. at 279, 275 P. at 395."
If this is true, how is it legal to shoot targets on your own private land, as so many do? One certainly has to carry in order to shoot.
Surely this case law is negated by further case law or statute, right? If not, this seems a blatant infringement of the 2nd A. If I can't keep and bear on my own property, then where??