Man who defended himself with licensed gun may still face charges

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
36,250
Reaction score
66,610
Location
NW OK
Yup, it sounds like the United States is becoming just like the socialists over in Europe. Someone gets the crap beat out them and then the victim goes to jail. I guess we will have to wait till there is a complete investigation. :screwy::pissed::madbox:


http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/14/man-who-defended-himself-with-licensed-gun-may-still-face-charges/
Man who defended himself with licensed gun may still face charges
5:57 PM 03/14/2014
Scott Greer

..."Two of the individuals held down the 39-year old man while a third one beat him with a baseball bat. The maintenance worker was able to free himself and fatally shoot two of the attackers with his concealed carry permitted gun."...
 
Last edited:

DFarcher

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
282
Reaction score
1
Location
Lincoln County
Yup, it sounds like the United States is becoming just like the socialists over in Europe. Someone gets the crap beat out them and then the victim goes to jail. I guess we will have to wait till there is a complete investigation. :screwy::pissed::madbox:


http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/14/man-who-defended-himself-with-licensed-gun-may-still-face-charges/
Man who defended himself with licensed gun may still face charges
5:57 PM 03/14/2014
Scott Greer

..."Two of the individuals held down the 39-year old man while a third one beat him with a baseball bat. The maintenance worker was able to free himself and fatally shoot two of the attackers with his concealed carry permitted gun."...

Nothing to talk about here until statements are taken and the janitor is either cleared or charged.
 

tRidiot

Perpetually dissatisfied
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
19,521
Reaction score
12,715
Location
Bartlesville
That's the paper speculating he may still have charges filed... stupid media. The authorities released him, and yes of course they're still investigating. Don't get all up in arms.
 

rusty-c

Marksman
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma
That's the paper speculating he may still have charges filed... stupid media. The authorities released him, and yes of course they're still investigating. Don't get all up in arms.

Smart fellow not giving a statement before being properly represented. No twisting of the facts and his name cleared is the best outcome in this situation.
 

0311

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
2,293
Reaction score
2
Location
Hell
Smart fellow not giving a statement before being properly represented. No twisting of the facts and his name cleared is the best outcome in this situation.

A smart fellow who would be smarter still, not to ever put himself intentionally into a dangerous environment like that again. Had he not gone there, a teenage girl would still be alive.
 

Arin Morris

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
656
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma City
A smart fellow who would be smarter still, not to ever put himself intentionally into a dangerous environment like that again. Had he not gone there, a teenage girl would still be alive.

I don't understand this statement. According to the article, he was a maintenance worker doing his job by replacing a lock on an apartment door of a tenant who was being evicted. Apparently the apartment belonged to a friend of the teens and they then beat him with a bat thinking he was the manager of the complex. Am I missing something?
 

0311

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
2,293
Reaction score
2
Location
Hell
The maintenance worker had every right to be there, but it was an area known to be dangerous. I'll select a few paragraphs to try to emphasize what I mean.

"On Wednesday afternoon, the currently unidentified maintenance worker was accosted by three young individuals while he was changing the locks at an apartment located in a rough area of Milwaukee. According to Fox6 News, the three assailants mistook the janitor for the building manager and attacked him over the fact that one of their friends was put on notice for eviction."

The paragraph above states that the apartment was located in a rough area of Milwaukee.

"His lawyer told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that his client has a permit to carry a handgun and feels it is an “occupational necessity” to carry a firearm with him."

The paragraph above states that the maintenance worker has a permit to carry because occupational necessity.

"A friend of the assault victim says that he is a “peaceful” man who has worked many years in an area that others would refuse to work in."

In the sentence above, the article states he has worked for many years in an area that others refuse to work in. I assert that he voluntarily went into an area he knew was dangerous, and was attacked. If he had avoided the danger area, he would not been attacked by this trio and would not have shot and killed the 17 year old girl.
 

rusty-c

Marksman
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma
The maintenance worker had every right to be there, but it was an area known to be dangerous. I'll select a few paragraphs to try to emphasize what I mean.

"On Wednesday afternoon, the currently unidentified maintenance worker was accosted by three young individuals while he was changing the locks at an apartment located in a rough area of Milwaukee. According to Fox6 News, the three assailants mistook the janitor for the building manager and attacked him over the fact that one of their friends was put on notice for eviction."

The paragraph above states that the apartment was located in a rough area of Milwaukee.

"His lawyer told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that his client has a permit to carry a handgun and feels it is an “occupational necessity” to carry a firearm with him."

The paragraph above states that the maintenance worker has a permit to carry because occupational necessity. A friend of the assault victim says that he is a “peaceful” man who has worked many years in an area that others would refuse to work in.

"A friend of the assault victim says that he is a “peaceful” man who has worked many years in an area that others would refuse to work in."

In the sentence above, the article states he has worked for many years in an area that others refuse to work in. I assert that he voluntarily went into an area he knew was dangerous, and was attacked. If he had avoided the danger area, he would not been attacked by this trio and would not have shot and killed the 17 year old girl.

The man has a right to make a living. Someone was going to do the job in the area and if he had been there many years it appears that he likely had a good relationship with the residents.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom