I didn't assume it. I said it was my theory. If it wasn't LE, I think it much more likely that it was someone the shooter was connected to rather than friend/family of the victims. Either way, I think he was executed rather than commiting suicide.
ok just going off what you wrote. not sure what you mean by connected with. if you mean somebody who was in on it i guess coulda been that. it would make sense if they was trying to not get caught. i still think there would be a good chance it was a relative of a victim. a lot of people would want to make sure they got revenge if they got the chance. on the other hand lots of these cowards do kill themselves after they do something like this but the guns still gonna be there, if it ain't definitley got to be murder. lot of questions that we may never get answered like many other mass shootings.
Last edited:
I've had a suicide with two shots to the head. First one was under the chin and just blew his face off, second was to the forehead and did the final damage but it took his body a while to catch up with the idea he was dead.
In LA in the 70’s, I had an ER patient who put a long gun under his chin (while still inside a sporting goods store). Had difficulty finding the trigger due to the length & just blew off his jaw yet amazingly survived. (Thyroid cartilage was visible).
Prob regretted not using a handgun instead.
Prob regretted not using a handgun instead.
You know you're a loser when it takes 2 shots to kill your pathetic self. Why can't these people just find a vacant field somewhere to end their pathetic lives. At least the varmints could eat for a couple of days.
Similar threads
