Missouri Democrats proposing to confiscate guns and magazines!

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

jstaylor62

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
2,096
Reaction score
575
Location
Moore, OK
http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills131/biltxt/intro/HB0545I.HTM

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:



Section A. Chapter 571, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 571.023, to read as follows:

571.023. 1. As used in this section the following terms shall mean:

(1) "Assault weapon", any:

(a) Semi-automatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following:

a. A pistol grip or thumbhole stock;

b. Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the nontrigger hand;

c. A folding or telescoping stock; or

d. A shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel;

(b) Semi-automatic pistol, or any semi-automatic, centerfire or rimfire rifle with a fixed magazine, that has the capacity to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition;

(c) Semi-automatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following:

a. Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the nontrigger hand;

b. A folding, telescoping or thumbhole stock;

c. A shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel; or

d. The capacity to accept a detachable magazine at any location outside of the pistol grip;

(d) Semi-automatic shotgun that has one or more of the following:

a. A pistol grip or thumbhole stock;

b. Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the nontrigger hand;

c. A folding or telescoping stock;

d. A fixed magazine capacity in excess of five rounds; or

e. An ability to accept a detachable magazine;

(e) Shotgun with a revolving cylinder; or

(f) Conversion kit, part, or combination of parts, from which an assault weapon can be assembled if those parts are in the possession or under the control of the same person.



Assault weapon does not include any firearm that has been made permanently inoperable;

(2) "Detachable magazine", an ammunition feeding device that can be loaded or unloaded while detached from a firearm and readily inserted into a firearm and includes a magazine that can be detached by merely depressing a button on the firearm either with a finger or by use of a tool or bullet;

(3) "Fixed magazine", an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action;

(4) "Large capacity magazine", any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds, but shall not be construed to include any of the following:

(a) A feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds;

(b) A twenty-two caliber tube ammunition feeding device; or

(c) A tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm.

2. No person, corporation or other entity in the state of Missouri may manufacture, import, possess, purchase, sell, or transfer any assault weapon or large capacity magazine.

3. This prohibition shall not apply to:

(1) Any government officer, agent, or employee, member of the armed forces of the United States, or peace officer, to the extent that such person is otherwise authorized to acquire or possess an assault weapon or large capacity magazine, and does so while acting within the scope of his or her duties;

(2) The manufacture of an assault weapon or large capacity ammunition feeding device by a firearms manufacturer for the purpose of sale to any branch of the armed forces of the United States, or to a law enforcement agency in the state of Missouri for use by that agency or its employees, provided the manufacturer is properly licensed under federal and state laws; or

(3) The sale or transfer of an assault weapon or large capacity ammunition feeding device by a dealer that is properly licensed under federal, state, and local laws to any branch of the armed forces of the United States, or to a law enforcement agency in the state of Missouri for use by that agency or its employees for law enforcement purposes.

4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:

(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;

(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or

(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.

5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.


:finger:
 

CoachR64

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
Location
OKC
Surrender to the state agency... They not only want to disarm their citizens, but they want to take and keep the arms for themselves. I hope if this passes, the gun owners of Missouri refuse to comply with this totally unconstitutional law.
 

XD-9Guy

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
3,251
Reaction score
6
Location
OKC
Where I am from in Missouri I can assure you they are, and have been, contacting their legislators to voice their opposition. But Missouri has the same issues as New York & Illinois, although to a lesser extent - meaning the densely populated areas (KC & STL) filled with government sponges wielding too much influence in voting. I hope that this doesn't come to pass in my home state, it would truly disgust me.
 

71buickfreak

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
4,790
Reaction score
30
Location
stillwater
Wow. You know, it took several years, but when Gabby Giffords was shot, I said that would be recognized as the first shot of the revolution, and I think that may stand. I mean, she was a Dem politico, nobody cared too much intul she got shot, and then the ball started rolling towards other things. Newtown was the screaming siren, but Arizona was the first shot. This is going to get ugly.
 

BIG_MIKE2005

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
1,330
Reaction score
0
Location
Skiatook
Wow, I'm actually surprised to see this coming from one of the bible belt states. Hopefully it doesn't get any traction & if it does everyone mass objects & refuses to comply. We shall not go quietly into the night while they strip our Constitutional Rights. There will be a fight if this continues, it's only a matter of time. They lit the fuse already, now it's just a question of how long the fuse is & whats gonna happen when it meets the powder.
 

ez bake

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,535
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa Area
Quite disappointed that anyone in MO legislation would even consider putting that out on the floor.

Good that they did though - it will help highlight the fact that confiscation is the underlying motive.
 

Old Fart

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 29, 2008
Messages
22,400
Reaction score
6
Location
XXX
I'd suspect something similar has or will be brought up here. Someone along the lines of a Richard Moristti or whatever his name is. The guy who does the point-counterpoint thing on News9 weekends. There's plenty of liberal politicians in this state also. Althought currently the overwhelming majority would vote against it. Just makes you realize thier out there.
 

radarmonkey

Let's go Brandon
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,882
Reaction score
2,567
Location
Edmond, Ok
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...arms-gives-gunowners-90-days-to-turn-in-guns/

Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.

Dana Loesch Radio reported on the new legislation being pushed by Missouri Democrats:


Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.

Here’s part of the Democratic proposal in Missouri:


4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:

(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;

(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or

(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.

5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom