More Turnpikes

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,335
Reaction score
4,324
Location
OKC area
Your obviously a long range planning engineer, I had no idea. Congratulations to u for that wealth of knowledge and experience.

And you obviously got your britches all wadded up. Lighten up Francis. We're just spitballing...

The info is coming right from the press release maps. Connecting I-40 and I-44. Luther at the north end and IVO Peebly at the south in order to "make travel from OKC to Tulsa faster". Just how many interchanges are they going to put in that 20 mile stretch huh? Obviously you're such a brilliant planner that ODOT consulted with you.

Been down I-40 east at rush hour? Traffic at the 40/240/Choctaw Rd area is bonkers....what are they "relieving" by adding potential north east bound traffic to that flow?

I'm sure it's part of some larger loop plan, but the way they are selling it makes no sense.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
87,548
Reaction score
69,663
Location
Ponca City Ok
but you honestly think the power brokers and money folks had zero influence on the route? You think it was all left up to neutral transportation engineers? .

Its all conspiracy theory on my part, but you may have a leg to stand on considering some instances in the past of putting in power line rights of way from the Woodward wind farm to OKC distribution centers. It totally skirted the land owned by Grondyke, who is a Commisioner on the Wildlife Department, and owner of a huge trucking company that transports oil and gasoline.
Skirting that property added millions to the cost of the power line, and its the rate payers that pick up the tab.

Again I have no proof, but if one looks at a map of the power line, it should have cut right through his property, yet it followed the property line around it.
 

turkeyrun

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
10,310
Reaction score
11,059
Location
Walters
I remember when H. E. Bailey was built. The toll ($0.10) was to be collected only until the cost was recovered, then it would be a freeway.

Now toll is $1.50. Been 50 yrs and I supposed the original cost will be recovered soon, or maybe not.
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
24,242
Reaction score
18,422
Location
Under your bed
And you obviously got your britches all wadded up. Lighten up Francis. We're just spitballing...

The info is coming right from the press release maps. Connecting I-40 and I-44. Luther at the north end and IVO Peebly at the south in order to "make travel from OKC to Tulsa faster". Just how many interchanges are they going to put in that 20 mile stretch huh? Obviously you're such a brilliant planner that ODOT consulted with you.

Been down I-40 east at rush hour? Traffic at the 40/240/Choctaw Rd area is bonkers....what are they "relieving" by adding potential north east bound traffic to that flow?

I'm sure it's part of some larger loop plan, but the way they are selling it makes no sense.
I'm no planning engineer never claimed to be. And I never saw any of the media reports showing alignment that's why I asked you to tell me them

Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
 

Hobbes

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
8,737
Reaction score
749
Location
The Nations
Congressman Darrell Issa has used his position in congress to steer millions of dollars in highway spending earmarks toward roads and highways that border properties owned by his company.
The value of the land soared and Issa is now one of the richest men in congress.

I have always heard that then Senator Bellmon obtained inside information about the route of the I-240 expansion and bought up land along the route, which he later sold for a profit.

I don't doubt this is motivated in the same way a bit.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom