Oh and show me the exact route please and every connecting interchange because as a long term planning engineer your obviously know its not just serving the 2 termini.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Your obviously a long range planning engineer, I had no idea. Congratulations to u for that wealth of knowledge and experience.
but you honestly think the power brokers and money folks had zero influence on the route? You think it was all left up to neutral transportation engineers? .
That was the story with the Turner, too. As you can see, it was true for both...The toll ($0.10) was to be collected only until the cost was recovered, then it would be a freeway.
I'm no planning engineer never claimed to be. And I never saw any of the media reports showing alignment that's why I asked you to tell me themAnd you obviously got your britches all wadded up. Lighten up Francis. We're just spitballing...
The info is coming right from the press release maps. Connecting I-40 and I-44. Luther at the north end and IVO Peebly at the south in order to "make travel from OKC to Tulsa faster". Just how many interchanges are they going to put in that 20 mile stretch huh? Obviously you're such a brilliant planner that ODOT consulted with you.
Been down I-40 east at rush hour? Traffic at the 40/240/Choctaw Rd area is bonkers....what are they "relieving" by adding potential north east bound traffic to that flow?
I'm sure it's part of some larger loop plan, but the way they are selling it makes no sense.
Your obviously a long range planning engineer, I had no idea. Congratulations to u for that wealth of knowledge and experience.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: