Newtown Legislation - Why?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

dutchwrangler

Sharpshooter
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
2,155
Reaction score
2
Location
West OKC
show me the security tape of lanza walking up to the school with a rifle and then managing to get past a locked door and i;ll let it go.

There are no tapes since it never happened. Speculating as to the number of shooters is a worthless endeavor then. These "events" are tests by officialdom and their media lapdogs to promulgate an agenda... the theft of freedom via arms confiscation/banning and martial law. With a population of stupid, ignorant and naive retards it's only a matter of time before freedom is history...
 

IndVet

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
920
Reaction score
59
Location
Choctaw
With a population of stupid, ignorant and naive retards it's only a matter of time before freedom is history...

Besides the fact that using the word "retards" is offensive (yes I know you don't care), I think it's abundantly clear that a large population of the people you refer to are members of this site. All it takes is to see all the unsubstantiated conspiracies that are taken as fact besides the lack of evidence.
 

dutchwrangler

Sharpshooter
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
2,155
Reaction score
2
Location
West OKC
Besides the fact that using the word "retards" is offensive (yes I know you don't care), I think it's abundantly clear that a large population of the people you refer to are members of this site. All it takes is to see all the unsubstantiated conspiracies that are taken as fact besides the lack of evidence.

In spite of the fact that you're offended by the term "retards", I was referring the overall populace of people the world over. In my world of trucking, retard refers to the slowing action of an engine, which holds back a truck on a downhill grade via an engine retarder. The fact remains that many on this site (as you mention) as well as people the world over (to whom I refer) are held back from the truth via their lack of desire to seek the truth. Most people live in the moment and thus forget about the past and discount the future.

There is but one truth in the entire universe. As a deist, I seek the truth. In my studies of human nature and history, along with other fields of science, there is a pattern and symmetry that is leading me towards T(t)ruth. I have no time to worry about folks being offended by terminology that appeases the politically correct and slow witted among us.

There are those in government who understand the lazy nature of people. Lazy in both the physical sense but more importantly those who are lazy in applying reason and logic to the philosophical aspect of coming to know the Truth. Government, in and of itself, is anti-truth. It steals from those who have to support itself. It is a parasite. And as is the nature of parasites, it eventually kills the host. Of course in the process it seals it's own fate of death. Many folks willingly accept the "official story", which because it's put out there by imperfect human beings, are full of inconsistencies and holes. I mentioned a few days ago how I'm eagerly waiting for the slew of survivors from the Boston "event" to come forward with their stories. Same for the Aurora, Sandy Hook and other events. Months later... nada. Nothing is heard after the next story comes along to prompt people to forget the previous story. I find that odd...
 

cjjtulsa

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
7,306
Reaction score
2,544
Location
Oologah
Just because something horrible does not automatically mean there is a government conspiracy.

No. But when there's evidence that doesn't quite add up, evidence which points to something other than what we're told, evidence that is withheld from the public (even spurring legislation just for this case to withhold it from the public), when there's threats of disseminating any information other than what the "authorities" (think about that word for a minute) tell us we can, else risk prosecution - logic dictates that the event needs much, much more scrutiny. And when the result of the event is the possible destruction of one of our Constitutional rights, and yet people are quick to just dismiss it as what those that stand to benefit from the event tell us it was, I have a problem with that.

Equating the logical skepticism over something like Sandy Hook to thinking the Tornadoes last week were "government conspiracies" is only a form of misdirection because someone doesn't have a solid argument.
 

dutchwrangler

Sharpshooter
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
2,155
Reaction score
2
Location
West OKC

cjjtulsa

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
7,306
Reaction score
2,544
Location
Oologah
show me the security tape of lanza walking up to the school with a rifle and then managing to get past a locked door and i;ll let it go.

Exactly. Show me security footage of Lanza walking into the school, and down the halls alone, with his one long gun, and I'll let it go.

They won't, because they can't. He had "handlers". And yes, Glocktogo - I believe they were members of one our infallible alphabet agencies.
 

reddog1

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
11,599
Reaction score
187
Location
FEMA Reigion 6 Broken Arrow
Besides the fact that using the word "retards" is offensive (yes I know you don't care), I think it's abundantly clear that a large population of the people you refer to are members of this site. All it takes is to see all the unsubstantiated conspiracies that are taken as fact besides the lack of evidence.

Do you need the WAAAMMbulance?

Just let me know, I will call one for you.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
26,251
Reaction score
5,081
Location
Rogers County
No. But when there's evidence that doesn't quite add up, evidence which points to something other than what we're told, evidence that is withheld from the public (even spurring legislation just for this case to withhold it from the public), when there's threats of disseminating any information other than what the "authorities" (think about that word for a minute) tell us we can, else risk prosecution - logic dictates that the event needs much, much more scrutiny. And when the result of the event is the possible destruction of one of our Constitutional rights, and yet people are quick to just dismiss it as what those that stand to benefit from the event tell us it was, I have a problem with that.

Equating the logical skepticism over something like Sandy Hook to thinking the Tornadoes last week were "government conspiracies" is only a form of misdirection because someone doesn't have a solid argument.

I'll agree with you.I'm of the opinion that things about sandy hook didnt add up either. especially about the two men in the woods and whatnot.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom