I think they are making asses out of themselves. But no, they aren't weird.
They should have hot girls in bikinis holding a car wash for charity while carrying ARs.
Sent from my LG-E980 using Tapatalk
I'd take my dirtiest truck and head for Texas ASAP if they did that. Then, I'd go run through the nearest mudhole and do it all again.
I don't think the people were "weird", per say. But I think the act was weirdly prevocational.
Pity. I thought NRA pegged it exactly right with their initial public statement -- that they're now walking back.
The claim isn't that the open carry of combative long guns in populated areas is never appropriate. But it is weird, and generally socially inappropriate, when in a functioning civil society. Handguns are the normal self-defense arm carried within civil society.
Carrying a slung long gun on the street is for when you're patrolling your neighborhood after a Katrina-style social breakdown.
Ironically, OCT's frivolous, drama-whoring use of rifle open carry rights in normal times risks leading to a legal backlash that could come back to bite gun owners in case of a Katrina-like event, when toting a slung rifle in certain places could, as I said, be a very relevant and valuable form of bearing arms, for a time, in order to deter trouble.
TLDR: Yes, open carry of long guns in public should be legal, because it could be quite valuable in uncommon situations. But OCT's practice of routine long gun open carry at freaking Chipotle or whatever is still weird and socially inappropriate.
, how do you draw the line as to what is acceptable if no specific guidance was provided during legislation of the open carry laws?
Enter your email address to join: