Obama Begins Push for New National Retirement System

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
2,455
Reaction score
228
Location
Tulsa
i1235.photobucket.com_albums_ff422_Lurkerinthewoods_8191317327_5180e95d98_z.jpg
 

gun001guns

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
1,537
Reaction score
0
Location
sulphur
The government has done such a good job with Social Security System why not give our private retirement to them. LOL!! I personally would love to have the option to "opt out" of the SS System and take what I've paid in and fore go any benefits I would be entitled to when I'm old.
 

MLRyan

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
1,560
Reaction score
0
Location
Del City
So under Obamacare, I have to pay for the healthcare of the lazy. Under the Obama retirement plan will I eventually have to pay for the retirement of the lazy too? Because that would piss just about everyone off.
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
87,575
Reaction score
69,719
Location
Ponca City Ok
Much too simple an answer. Again, most folks seem to forget that Article 1, Section 8 is a list of finite, limited powers granted to the federal government by the states to address issues that affected the confederation as whole. The very fact that the Commerce Clause falls within this set of limited powers illustrates that the federal government does not have authority over many aspects of our daily activities. Commerce at the time of the Constitution's drafting pertained to trade and exchange (simple explanation, historically it goes back to precolonial days were the regulation of commerce was the law merchant, which Parliament had the ability to regulate if it was for the general welfare of the Colonies as well as among the political units of the British Empire) between the colonies. The Founders sought to stimulate America's economy, as as such the federal government could prohibit or discourage importation/exportation of selected commodities/products. Certain issues that were obstacles of commerce between the states also fell under these enumerated limits. And keep in mind, that the last paragraph of Article 1, Section 8 that Congress were permitted "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for the carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers..."; meaning those specific, enumerated powers listed in Article 1, Section 8. The Commerce Clause never granted carte blanche power to regulate every facet of activity within the states. Arguing that it does would be in opposition to the reasonable belief that the states would ever cede powers to the federal government areas that they could address and take care of themselves. Again, the ratifying debates of the separate states shows how each understood the different clauses presented to them within the text of the Constitution. The Federalist repeatedly assured the states that powers granted under Article 1, Section 8 were limited and finite. To believe that the states would cede unlimited power to the federal government would be a contradiction of Article 1, Section 8 as they understood it, a limit on federal power. I've eluded to one thing repeatedly, the federal government has no vested interest in policing itself and limiting itself to adhere to the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Since the New Deal era, it has worked tirelessly to scheme of ways to bypass those enumerated powers and reduce the power of the states and the people.

Is there any way to break that up into sentences and paragraphs? Man, thats hard to follow.
 

HMFIC

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
11,193
Reaction score
11
Location
Tulsa
The government has done such a good job with Social Security System why not give our private retirement to them. LOL!! I personally would love to have the option to "opt out" of the SS System and take what I've paid in and fore go any benefits I would be entitled to when I'm old.

Ya isn't it funny how the idea of letting people opt out of SS has been floated for a while and now they're taking the 180 degree view on it.

I don't think there's much chance of this happening really... too many people have too much money at stake. Then again, stranger things have happened.
 

okietool

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
5,354
Reaction score
2,146
Location
under the rock
I wonder how that sits with Fidelity, Vanguard and the other big 401k management firms?
Does any one know the dollar amount in United States citizen 401Ks?
One of the companies I worked for would only match in company stock, then all of a sudden they would put their match in any of the funds we were elidgible for. It crossed my mind that employees were starting to have too much stock.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom