Nope I'm good, I'll pass.F*ck Obama!
Nope I'm good, I'll pass.F*ck Obama!
You simply can't deny that this is socialism at it's finest/worst depending on which side you are on.
Much too simple an answer. Again, most folks seem to forget that Article 1, Section 8 is a list of finite, limited powers granted to the federal government by the states to address issues that affected the confederation as whole. The very fact that the Commerce Clause falls within this set of limited powers illustrates that the federal government does not have authority over many aspects of our daily activities. Commerce at the time of the Constitution's drafting pertained to trade and exchange (simple explanation, historically it goes back to precolonial days were the regulation of commerce was the law merchant, which Parliament had the ability to regulate if it was for the general welfare of the Colonies as well as among the political units of the British Empire) between the colonies. The Founders sought to stimulate America's economy, as as such the federal government could prohibit or discourage importation/exportation of selected commodities/products. Certain issues that were obstacles of commerce between the states also fell under these enumerated limits. And keep in mind, that the last paragraph of Article 1, Section 8 that Congress were permitted "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for the carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers..."; meaning those specific, enumerated powers listed in Article 1, Section 8. The Commerce Clause never granted carte blanche power to regulate every facet of activity within the states. Arguing that it does would be in opposition to the reasonable belief that the states would ever cede powers to the federal government areas that they could address and take care of themselves. Again, the ratifying debates of the separate states shows how each understood the different clauses presented to them within the text of the Constitution. The Federalist repeatedly assured the states that powers granted under Article 1, Section 8 were limited and finite. To believe that the states would cede unlimited power to the federal government would be a contradiction of Article 1, Section 8 as they understood it, a limit on federal power. I've eluded to one thing repeatedly, the federal government has no vested interest in policing itself and limiting itself to adhere to the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Since the New Deal era, it has worked tirelessly to scheme of ways to bypass those enumerated powers and reduce the power of the states and the people.
The government has done such a good job with Social Security System why not give our private retirement to them. LOL!! I personally would love to have the option to "opt out" of the SS System and take what I've paid in and fore go any benefits I would be entitled to when I'm old.
Enter your email address to join: