Of course not. But current law offers little protections for the one who brandishes.
If you draw to defend yourself because of fear of your life or major body damage, by law it is brandishing if you don't fire?
What if I tried to fire but gun malfunctions.
After some reflection, I don't think this bill will make much difference.
In the above scenario, there's no proof whether you were brandishing without reason or displaying your firearm in self-defense. It's still your word against two people, even if they are thugs.
I don't see how it helps anything, since you're already protected if a threat can be established. And that must be determined with or without the bill.
Instead of the bill, we might should look at our instructors a little closer. If we have instructors telling students that a shot must be fired if you draw your weapon to prevent brandishing charges, maybe we should take away intructors license.
Who said that?
Not my instructor.
I'm guessing a complete moron.
I'm guessing nobody, since he can't produce anyone.
Similar threads
