President Trump Quietly Rolling Back Obama-Era Gun Controls

[MacFromOK]

SS is nothing more than a type of insurance, and you have to pay in for a period of time before you can draw benefits.

And like standard insurance, some will lie, cheat, and take advantage of it. But that doesn't mean some folks don't have legitimate claims.

 

[Glocktogo]

you have a victim mentality, people should know that there are consequences for getting a free ride off society.

You have a ridiculous mentality. A right is a right, period. No one cares that you don't agree, because you are wrong.

 

[Pokinfun]

You have a ridiculous mentality. A right is a right, period. No one cares that you don't agree, because you are wrong.

No, you can give up a Right, people do it everyday. closing your eyes to reality, does not make it true.

 

[Glocktogo]

No, you can give up a Right, people do it everyday. closing your eyes to reality, does not make it true.

Wrong. You can allow a trespass on your rights, but rights must be removed by a court of law.

 

[Pokinfun]

Wrong. You can allow a trespass on your rights, but rights must be removed by a court of law.

I think if you go back and read, I point out that people claiming a disability go in front of a judge.
and by the way, I am being polite, you are being a jerk.

 

[dennishoddy]

"Trump “officials have also signaled that they may no longer defend the Army Corps of Engineers’ ban on carrying loaded firearms and ammunition on federal lands.”

Lets hope this happens. One good thing that happened during obama's term was that people are now allowed to carry in national parks.
The COE is still fighting allowing gun owners to legally carry in their boat or in camp grounds, other than when being carried for hunting on surrounding WMA's.

 

[Glocktogo]

I think if you go back and read, I point out that people claiming a disability go in front of a judge.
and by the way, I am being polite, you are being a jerk.

They go to SS court to claim benefits, not to be stripped of their natural rights. They haven't committed any crimes and being incapable of managing their financial affairs in no way impedes their ability to understand when they're being attacked and need to defend themselves.

The elderly and infirm are prime targets for predators. They are the least likely to be capable of physical defense without aids like firearms. You're saying it's OK to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights without proof that they're an unreasonable danger to themselves or others.

But yeah, I'm being a jerk.

 

[Pokinfun]

I'm not saying its ok, I'm just saying it is what can happen. Its amazing how people such as you trust the government.

 

[Rod Snell]

I am astounded that anti-government sentiment can be perverted into blaming the victims of outright abuse of government power.
I met a fellow USAF airman at the VA hospital who went into service the same month as I in 1966, but had been nearly blown apart by a mortar attack in Viet Nam, spent YEARS in the hospitals, and was finally allowed to live at home in Oklahoma, but had to visit the hospital monthly. He was grievously physically handicapped, but mentally sharp. He authorized his family to access his records and help with the endless paperwork. He was one of over 168,000 vets administratively declared mentally incompetent by the last administration with NO DUE PROCESS and NO REVIEW.
Exactly how did he "get a free ride" or "give up his rights? And by the way, he never went in front of any judge or claimed anything, the VA determined his disability and treatment after his WAR INJURY.

 

[OKCHunter]

...One good thing that happened during obama's term was that people are now allowed to carry in national parks...

Thanks to an Oklahoma Republican named Tom Colburn.