I would need to see more of what the man stands for. I am pretty happy with Fallin so far.
the totalitarian?
- no guns on state property (except for her and her people) - criminals are know to follow the law in "gun-free" zones as we all know
- no e-cigs on state property (saves people from smoking the real thing; emits water vapor) - this law is sort of like"keep of the grass"...it is "just because she can"...may as well call her Mayor Bloomberg; what's next, large sodas state-wide?
I "think" Brogdon might be more libertarian than she based on how i remember Mark Shannon talking about him.
could post more links but will post just two..
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/249784.php
http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm173222.htm
But they don't hurt other people's lungs...Will you be so understanding if she mandated veganism on you? PRINCIPLE DOES MATTER...
I think this is so funny that I find myself on this side of the argument this time...because I am very well-versed in health and alternative health matters and usually I'm the one who is slammed when I take a position like you are now. But in this case, I am analyzing the situation and siding with LIBERTY.
Bloomberg is 100% right about soda being bad for you; I agree with him. And if the FDA were to ban Aspartame (a known poison that pollutes even our rivers and water ways) then I'd actually support it...but I won't support a mayor or a governor banning a select product that contains it; that is a nanny state...To put it another way, if there was mercury in a Big Mac then ban the mercury and not the Big Mack; that is much more logical....do any of the intellectually honest among you see my point on that?
could post more links but will post just two..
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/249784.php
Enter your email address to join: