Bet he has a face tattoo
Sheriff is up for re-election. That's what this is about.
I have never gotten caught Clay...
Pandering for votes for sure...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/kfor.c...-for-second-amendment-sanctuary-counties/amp/
Canadian County sheriff announces support for ‘Second Amendment Sanctuary Counties’
KFOR-TV and K. Querry
1 min ago
https://www.google.com/amp/s/kfor.c...-for-second-amendment-sanctuary-counties/amp/
Canadian County sheriff announces support for ‘Second Amendment Sanctuary Counties’
KFOR-TV and K. Querry
1 min ago
https://www.google.com/amp/s/kfor.c...-for-second-amendment-sanctuary-counties/amp/
https://www.swoknews.com/news/steph...cle_7370d44a-d2a5-50cb-a134-4b9120dd3ae4.html
Stephens County Sheriff declares intent to establish "Second Amendment Sanctuary County"
By Scott Rains
14 hrs
&
https://www.duncanbanner.com/commun...cle_c40aade2-4ec0-11ea-8b61-f7dc65093fcb.html
Sheriff declares Stephens Co. ‘Second Amendment Sanctuary County’
By Charlene Belew The Duncan Banner
21 hrs ago
Whatever it is, good faith, pandering for votes, setting a precedence, it's all good. I'm glad to see them saying this. It sets the tone for the others, and gives them something to think about.
It’s just more pandering. Guarantee the sheriff don’t truly support the 2A. Is he gonna not arrest a felon for carrying or owning a gun? Guarantee the sheriff would arrest them and then say it’s “the law”. And I guarantee they have done it already. These people always talk big bit don’t ever back it up. It’s all or nothing. Either you support the 2A for EVERYONE that is a citizen regardless if they are felon or not, or you don’t really support it. The term shall not be infringed was a directive to the government to not touch the 2A. Police officers that claim they support the 2A are liars. They wouldn’t be a cop if they did. I see it all the time on live pd, lone star law, north woods law, Alaska pd, etc., where the cops infringe on citizens 2A rights all the time. They don’t even bat an eye lash when they do it. It’s all about “enforcing the law”. Regardless if the law is unconstitutional.
Good grief, we get an elected representive who is voicing what we have been wanting, and we now question their reasons. Of course he wants our votes. That's the kind of politician we should be voting for, and supporting. That's how things get changed.
Similar threads
