My roofing guy prefers Malarkey and doesn’t like Tamco. We use Tamco though, and he just bitches about it, so. Six of one 1/2 dozen of the other.
So taking all this info into account, is there any reason to stick with the same brand (landmark) if replacing a partial roof. As mentioned, I will not be merging any old/new shingles together so only entire sides will be replaced and won't be visible together with other sides of the house side by side to see/compare the hopefully minor difference.
Situation is complex but basically years ago the insurance screwed me and only paid for a partial and I never did it...now I am going to finally take care of it and contract it myself but I need to do it for a reasonable cost while sticking with class IV IR shingles (I have access to several roofing crews directly).
Those charcoal shingles are mighty dark for our summer sun but they sure look good.I had my roof replaced in December last year.
GAF HDZ Charcoal. Looks good, complete tear off, ice and water shield, synthetic felt, 2 sections of decking replaced due to not going back with turbines but went with ridge vent.
Those guys did a good job, started around 8am rolled off cleaned up by 4pm.
Those charcoal shingles are mighty dark for our summer sun but they sure look good.
It will.I also hope the ridge vent out performs the two turbines on the previous roof.
They are 2 miles from my house on Council but I know nothing about them. I'd go with Elk if they are still in business. Been so long since I roofed houses and I dont miss that hard labor.Malarkey has a plant here don't they? I've heard decent things about them in the past. Curious why they are off the lost.
Enter your email address to join: