Pretty interesting, these attorneys say more times than not a video will hurt more than it helps your case.
Deal is it seems- there are cameras in a lot of places now days. All the detective shows pretty much solve the case with a video.
If your camera system doesn't catch what happens, someone else's will. Which perspective would you prefer the cops looking at?
I do not and will not have cameras at home , people who do are IMO doing themselves no favors .
Can't find it now, but there's a video out there showing views of a police shooting from 3 different police dash cams; from one you would think the cops had no right to shoot, another you couldn't be sure, and the third you could say they absolutely should have shot him.
Video doesn't always tell the thruth.
Video doesn't always tell the thruth.
I have cameras outside not inside. Inside is just stupid.
Video does indeed tell the truth. Just not all of it.
Agreed.
As for businesses, I know of one business owner that took out the cameras from his shop after the Ersland trial.
When it comes to the outside cameras they are great to get images of who was on the property, at the front door, broke in the door and when.
In real time or after the fact.
But this discussion has made me think there are some negative aspects also..
If you have an after action event,
One thing is for sure your council needs to review the video before handing it over to anyone else.
In real time or after the fact.
But this discussion has made me think there are some negative aspects also..
If you have an after action event,
One thing is for sure your council needs to review the video before handing it over to anyone else.
Similar threads
