They were not armed. It was a suicide mission.
Woody
Yeah, I know that. The person relating the story said as much and wondered if they could take out the tail with a wing and still be able to eject.
They were not armed. It was a suicide mission.
Woody
All it would take is good timing.Yeah, I know that. The person relating the story said as much and wondered if they could take out the tail with a wing and still be able to eject.
They weren’t the only ones unarmed.They were not armed. It was a suicide mission.
Woody
This line needs some clarification please.This is the essence of tyranny. Any government that fears its citizens should be feared by the citizens, and that’s for ‘dang’ sure…..
I understand what you wrote now. It's just that the way you wrote it originally sounded contradictory to me.When a government openly demonstrates that it fears its citizens by threatening to unleash the power of its military against them, the citizens who live under the control of that government have a valid reason to fear that government. Tyrannical governments ‘rule’ by force rather than functioning with the participation and ‘consent’ of their citizens…..
Just following orders……This is not a new concept my friends.
Way back in the early 90's,,,
A Marine officer was doing his research thesis for a Doctorate.
His thesis question was to simply ask active duty Marines,,,
If they would obey orders to fire on US Citizens during riot conditions.
This was in the news for months back then,,,
The officer defended his thesis question by stating,,,
Something like; "We need to know if our marines will obey drastic orders."
So this isn't something new,,,
Anyone remember Kent State?
According to news articles I read his research showed that over 70% of the participants,,,
Would be willing to fire upon US Citizens.
Aarond
.
Enter your email address to join: