The 2nd Amendment - What to say to a Liberal

[rhart]

I love this guy's videos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOwy9OWfnAM

I wish he would have addresses "well regulated" in it though. Well regulated - sufficiently trained and equipped.

 

[reddoubleddbra]

The video was informative however, I thought for the benefit of liberals he should have broken down each sentence

 

[rhart]

The video was informative however, I thought for the benefit of liberals he should have broken down each sentence

r

You can break it down to where a 3-year old could understand it and libs would refuse to understand it - even though many of them are smart enough to understand it they would argue against it as their agenda is to disarm us so they can go hog wild with destroying America. The word America is a bitter taste for them to even say it. They hate everything America stood for (notice I used past tense). They will rename America when they're done because the use of the word is a micro-aggression to them.

 

[Jack T.]

I prefer this argument:

http://journal.ijreview.com/2015/07/245635-gun-rights-advocates-have-a-devastating-new-argument-against-gun-control-here-it-is/

 

[Surveyor1653]

I prefer this argument:

http://journal.ijreview.com/2015/07/245635-gun-rights-advocates-have-a-devastating-new-argument-against-gun-control-here-it-is/

This argument has been my contention for a while now. Additionally, I would say to mock them. Deride them. Shame their stupidity. Three things (generally speaking) separate us from the rest of the animals: Logic, reason, and an opposable thumb. If one lacks the capacity for logic and reason, he's just a bald-assed ape. I'm tired of "debating" my natural right to self defense through modern arms with apes. It doesn't get me anywhere and, frankly, is a waste of my time and energy. "F*ck you" puts a nice bow on that sentiment.

 

[rhart]

I prefer this argument:

http://journal.ijreview.com/2015/07/245635-gun-rights-advocates-have-a-devastating-new-argument-against-gun-control-here-it-is/

I really like this one to use on hardcore liberal antigunners. The posted vid and others by the same author as well as ones by Woolery are good to try to educate/persuade people I think can be educated/persuaded.

 

[Jack T.]

I really like this one to use on hardcore liberal antigunners. The posted vid and others by the same author as well as ones by Woolery are good to try to educate/persuade people I think can be educated/persuaded.

*sigh* I'm to the point that I just assume anybody who is anti-gun is a hardcore liberal antigunner. Yes, I realize that's a bad position to take. If you (generic "you". . .not you personally) will go shoot with me, *then* I'll believe that we can at least have a logical conversation about guns. But if you won't even go shoot with me, then it's all about feels and I default to the "screw you" argument.

That being said, I will use some of the video's arguments. . .but only as a retort when an anti-gunner makes a ridiculous statement. I'm old enough that I have stopped ignoring blatantly ignorant statements from libs.

 

[Glocktogo]

That being said, I will use some of the video's arguments. . .but only as a retort when an anti-gunner makes a ridiculous statement. I'm old enough that I have stopped ignoring blatant ignorant statements from libs.

Wouldn't it just be easier to ask them if their parents had any children that actually lived?

 

[reddoubleddbra]

My great uncle worked for the Reagan administration and when dealling with liberals he used to say you can not be a child and not ave the heart of the liberal, and you can not be an adult and not have the mind of a conservative, Because while your child like heart wants to welcome everyone and give everyone what they need. Your brain reminds you that first someone has to pay this this as nothing is free and Second giving someone something because they want it will only make them want more.

 

[rhart]

I like that saying.