The Beautiful Humanity of Death Row

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

OK Corgi Rancher

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2020
Messages
8,248
Reaction score
26,153
Location
Greater Francis, OK metropolitan area
Beware of the premise that everyone on death row is guilty. Is executing an occasional innocent person ok?

Innocent of what?

I don't trust our legal/justice system 100%. But I trust it more than I trust statistics that show 1 in 10 people executed are "innocent".

But the answer to your question is, no, a truly innocent person should not be executed for a crime they didn't commit. But the system isn't, and can never be, perfect.
 

turkeyrun

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
10,042
Reaction score
10,484
Location
Walters
Beware of the premise that everyone on death row is guilty. Is executing an occasional innocent person ok?

If a jury of 12 can unanimously say death penalty, there is no doubt.
One innocent may get a wrong conviction. Having a Spread Eagle prosecutor, that is known to conceal evidence and manufacture evidence, in order to get a conviction, could convict innocents. Any prosecutor or defense attorney manufacturing or concealing evidence should replace the prisoner and serve out their sentence.


For those who confess, are caught in the act, or have positive identification from a witness; absolutely. Taxpayers paying 25+ years, awaiting final sentencing is BS.
Hanging, at noon Saturday, on the court house Square would be a deterrent and guarantee of no repeat offenders.
 

TedKennedy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
12,313
Reaction score
14,989
Location
Tulsa
If a jury of 12 can unanimously say death penalty, there is no doubt.
One innocent may get a wrong conviction. Having a Spread Eagle prosecutor, that is known to conceal evidence and manufacture evidence, in order to get a conviction, could convict innocents. Any prosecutor or defense attorney manufacturing or concealing evidence should replace the prisoner and serve out their sentence.
Ada, Oklahoma.

All it takes is a crooked DA, a crooked cop or a witness willing to lie. Get them all together and a horror story unfolds.
 

turkeyrun

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
10,042
Reaction score
10,484
Location
Walters
Ada, Oklahoma.

All it takes is a crooked DA, a crooked cop or a witness willing to lie. Get them all together and a horror story unfolds.
Spread Eagle had multiple convictions, as ADA in Kommiefornia, set a record.
Had been caught and admitted to withholding evidence and manufacturing evidence to gain a conviction.
None were death penalty cases, but she should have to serve those sentences.
 

WoodsCraft

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2022
Messages
1,583
Reaction score
3,021
Location
Oklahoma
Beware of the premise that everyone on death row is guilty. Is executing an occasional innocent person ok?

There are precious few folks on death row who do not have a criminal history and in many cases a very lengthy one at that. There are even fewer folks who had no criminal history at all who were convicted of a capitol crime and placed on Death Row.

I would much rather the odd "innocent man" get more punishment than he had coming for his crimes than to not meter out the much needed punishment the vast majority of these men have coming to them.
 

TedKennedy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
12,313
Reaction score
14,989
Location
Tulsa
There are precious few folks on death row who do not have a criminal history and in many cases a very lengthy one at that. There are even fewer folks who had no criminal history at all who were convicted of a capitol crime and placed on Death Row.

I would much rather the odd "innocent man" get more punishment than he had coming for his crimes than to not meter out the much needed punishment the vast majority of these men have coming to them.
Interesting. I wonder if you'd feel the same way if your son or grandson was locked up for a crime he didn't commit?
 

okcBob

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2020
Messages
6,222
Reaction score
10,564
Location
okc
There are precious few folks on death row who do not have a criminal history and in many cases a very lengthy one at that. There are even fewer folks who had no criminal history at all who were convicted of a capitol crime and placed on Death Row.

I would much rather the odd "innocent man" get more punishment than he had coming for his crimes than to not meter out the much needed punishment the vast majority of these men have coming to them.
Well you certainly don’t subscribe to the famous Blackstone ratio of “It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.“
Or as Ben Franklin stated it as: "it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer".

The American legal system echoes these common law values & has long erred on the side of protecting innocence.

A similar principal is in the Bible: “Abraham drew near, and said, "Will you consume the righteous with the wicked? What if there are fifty righteous within the city? Will you consume and not spare the place for the fifty righteous who are in it?.. What if ten are found there?" He [The Lord] said, "I will not destroy it for the ten's sake."

These long-standing US legal principles are the opposite of authoritarians from China, for example, in the 1930s: "Better to kill a hundred innocent people than let one truly guilty person go free"and during uprisings in Vietnam in the 1950s: "Better to kill ten innocent people than let a guilty person escape." And don’t forget Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge adopted a similar policy: "better arrest an innocent person than leave a guilty one free."

I’d rather live by the US system than the authoritarian police state, but you do you.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top Bottom