I am going to listen to sum fuggin SLAYER, screw you guys.
At what point do you believe we should intervene?
I am not searching, and I was waiting for this argument. You refer to the New Testament; as it happens, I quite agree with you that the New supplants the Old. That said, you refer to the Old (Ezekiel) as an argument. Do you find it convincing? If so, my question stands; if not, why do you refer to it?
It's going to be a very difficult. Israel would have to fly over hostile Arab airspace, refuel in the air and hit Multiple targets. The link below shows three uranium enrichment facilities. Israel was successful in a preempt airstrike on a single nuclear site in iraq in June of 1981. But today the situation is Iran is one country over and has many Nuclear sites. Estimates are it would take israel to deploy Up to 46 f-15's, 20 f-16's and seven kc-135 tankers. I bet USAF would provide at least awac support and maybe tanker support. One atomic bomb can take out Israel. Israel is only 8 miles wide at one point. They don't have resources for a second chance. Their survival strategy is very different from us. Israel is surrounded by enemies. Pretty interesting report below.
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/glob...eli-airstrike-irans-nuclear-facilities/48945/
I seriously doubt that anyone would ever nuke Israel. To do so, they'd have to take out Jerusalem and make it a perpetual hot zone. All three major religions consider Jerusalem a holy site. While the bad actors may want the Jews gone from there, none of them wants to eliminate the place itself.
That is a real good point, I hope you are right .
Enter your email address to join: