This Makes Me Nuts......

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dukester

Sharpshooter
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
1,505
Reaction score
1
Location
Sapulpa
I am frequently having to explain to people that the gun grabber's definition of an assault gun/weapon is based on a combination of dishonesty and ignorance. I then typically will give them the definition of an true assault rifle (even though its a made up term) as I know it. You know, the whole fully automatic and needing a class III license and all that. I then go on to explain that the term high capacity magazine is a relative term that cannot actually be defined as different firearms use magazines of different capacities by design, so a magazine might be a high capacity for one gun while being standard capacity for another. I've done this till I was blue in the face and then went so far as to write about it on my blog, with varying degrees of success. I never think of skipping the whole process because I think it's important that we all do what we can to put the truth out there. I imagine there are quite a few people on OSA who do the same thing.

So what really irks me to no end is the fact that after going through this process time and again, I can go on ARMSLIST and see some jackhole selling and AR or an AK and advertising it as an assault rifle that comes with high capacity mags. AAARRRGGGHHHH!!!! It's kind of hard to tell people that the term assault rifles was coined by anti gun people and has no real place in the firearm vernacular if people that should know better keep giving it a place in the firearm vernacular. The same goes for high capacity magazines. So basically when a grabber wants to discount everything that I've said they have but to visit ARMSLIST and see that even gun owners call them assault rifles and high capacity magazines. Am I the only one that sees it this way?
 

grizzly97

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
2,183
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa
You're not the only one. I both feel and have experienced the same frustrations. There are people in my office that like guns and don't want a ban on anything, but come to my office and say, "I'm looking to buy an assault rifle with high capacity clips. What should I get?" :scream: Sadly, the media has done a great job at controlling/persuading people's vocabulary, combined with ignorance and lack of experience of course.
 

stewartglock

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
2,008
Reaction score
8
Location
Kingfisher Co.
What blows me away, are the people that say, "I'm all for having guns, but there isn't a reason for anyone to have an assault rifle. I mean, I hunt and have guns, but no one needs a clip that holds 30 rounds."
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
773
Location
Muskogee
The term assault rifle or weapon, although incorrect for semi autos, was used by shooters themselves a long time before the media jumped on it.
img.photobucket.com_albums_v23_hberttmank_aws.jpg

img.photobucket.com_albums_v23_hberttmank_aws1.jpg
 

inactive

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,158
Reaction score
903
Location
I.T.
Whether the term is just or unjust, it's become the de facto (and during the AWB, the de jure) definition for those semiauto weapons. We shouldn't waste efforts arguing over the semantics. That's a fight we can't win.

We just need to work to keep assault weapons legal.
 

10Seconds

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa
Whether the term is just or unjust, it's become the de facto (and during the AWB, the de jure) definition for those semiauto weapons. We shouldn't waste efforts arguing over the semantics. That's a fight we can't win.

We just need to work to keep assault weapons legal.

Exactly! It has become the generic term much like Bandaid did for adhesive bandages. What do you ask for when cut? Same think here. Dont fight battles over what to call it, thats just wasted energy. Fight to keep it legal.
 

criticalbass

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
5,596
Reaction score
7
Location
OKC
Exactly! It has become the generic term much like Bandaid did for adhesive bandages. What do you ask for when cut? Same think here. Dont fight battles over what to call it, thats just wasted energy. Fight to keep it legal.

Forgive the OT entry here, but Band-Aid (may be spelling it wrong, long time now) is still a protected trademark. Several generations of attorneys have made lots of money protecting Johnson & Johnson's money making adhesive bandage (sticking plaster if you're a Brit . . . ). I used to be a personnel weenie for J&J. Great company to work for.

About the subject of the thread, we all need to be advocates of our 2-A rights. As to nobody needing a (insert scary gun related thing here), it's not about need. It's about rights.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom