So back to the roller coaster bridges....why didn't the state demand that the contractor replace the decks so that they are safe to drive on?
Who cares, its a toll road so your not paying for it unless you use it.
It wasnt the decks, it was all the beams under the decks. That would have cost the contractor to go belly up, he likely paid someone off and gave a couple BJs and it was a done deal. I dont know.So back to the roller coaster bridges....why didn't the state demand that the contractor replace the decks so that they are safe to drive on?
Be glad your getting some improved roads and quicha bitchin.It matters when it's the last option for crossing town.
Your prius wont do 120...Those whoop-de-doo bridges suck, try hitting it at 120, it get a bit hairy.
It wasnt the decks, it was all the beams under the decks. That would have cost the contractor to go belly up, he likely paid someone off and gave a couple BJs and it was a done deal. I dont know.
Clay said:Who cares, its a toll road so your not paying for it unless you use it.
That was the OTA, not ODOT.So what? You guys felt better about giving the public a sh1tty product than allowing an incompetant bridge builder to go broke?
Enter your email address to join: