I was just asking a question. You didn't exactly answer my question.
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
- Thread starter OKC03Cobra
- Start Date
Another biased opinion
I believe I heard Alan Dershowitz explain that the Texas case is claiming that Texas voters were disenfranchised due to the other states voting process being unconstitutional.
As is every American
Save for Iggy
Hats off, Clay. You caught me in a biased opinion, but Paxton has real legal problems that he probably won't be able to weather.
We'll just have to wait and see what happens.
one thing I read pointed out that the scotus doesn’t have to take a case between two states if it feels there are other avenues to resolution. If the same issue in question is being addressed in state or federal court, it might defer to those cases, rather than take up a state vs state case.
This is why I wish multiple states would join.
The Constitution does not authorize a legislature to delegate its powers as delineated in Article II, Section 1, Clause 2. Only the legislature of a state can change anything in the selection of electors. There is no provision in the Constitution to allow any changes to be made for any reason beyond what the state's legislature may enact. Those foot-loose self-anointed with power "officials" in those states that violated the Constitution need to be stripped of power, cited for misprision, and punished accordingly commiserate with the damage they have done to the right of the people to have a lawful say in the selection of the President. The entire elections in those subject states could be completely voided. Whatever remedy is appropriate is yet to be seen.
Woody
The SCOTUS just delivered a knock-out blow to Trump's attempts to overturn the election. With no dissents they rejected a request to block certification of the Nov. 3rd election.
The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases such as this. If the Court refuses to try this case and rule according to the Constitution, it will set in motion a free-for-all wherein all manner of unconstitutional mayhem will ensue. Say good-by to law and order and hello to chaos, insurrection, secession, revolution, inhibited interstate travel, collapsing markets ... eh ... you name it. It'll start inch by inch, progress foot by foot, mile by mile, and then it'll cascade into oblivion.
I think it is what the left wants. Chaos. They believe they can step in, take over, and utopia will be achieved. Certainly it won't be what the people would select, for their brand of utopia would require a compliant, servile, ignorant populace. We aren't quite there yet, and I doubt we will ever be. In the mean time, the left is nothing more than a dangerous, despicable, despotic pain in the ass.
Woody
I think it is what the left wants. Chaos. They believe they can step in, take over, and utopia will be achieved. Certainly it won't be what the people would select, for their brand of utopia would require a compliant, servile, ignorant populace. We aren't quite there yet, and I doubt we will ever be. In the mean time, the left is nothing more than a dangerous, despicable, despotic pain in the ass.
Woody
Similar threads
