I was considering yes until the commercials bad mouthing the politicians. Bad mouth someone else when you cant make your case on it's own merits I guess.
And incidentally, vote no on Susan Paddock and yes on one of her opponents while you're at it - Paddock is the only one running in that race in favor of 744.
I am voting no because it pegs our spending levels to a benchmark level determined by other states and because their is no source of funding, unfunded mandates will destroy district finances and budgets, we should not be constitutionally required to spend money because another state spends more.
I have an idea... We have multiple schools with under 200 students yet they still have superintendents that make over $92K a year. Consolidate or make supers float a couple of schools. It's ridiculous....
Schools have been cutting and cutting and cutting and the cuts aren't matched by the other state funded institutions.
The school I work at doesn't even have a janitor. But I saw 3 county workers watching 2 other county workers put a sign up yesterday. And the last time I got pulled over I found out apparently it takes 3 cars to write a warning.
Enter your email address to join: