What kills?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Which is deadlier?

  • Velocity

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Bullet Mass

    Votes: 16 66.7%

  • Total voters
    24
  • Poll closed .

udiablo

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
346
Reaction score
13
Location
in country
Shot placement matters, obviously, (in other words getting hit in the chest or head is likely lethal versus being hit on an extremity), so also consider getting hit with a BB traveling at 900fps, or a cannon ball traveling at 100fps.
 

aeropb

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
1
Location
Bethany
Your last premise fails the sniff test...
Which entirely destroys the straw man argument you've tossed out into the wind.

A derringer, especially a high caliber one is NOT Practical and I imagine you know that. Or would if you'd ever fired a high caliber derringer. You've got to get close enough to actually hit something with it 1st and if using a 45-70 (does a 45-70 derringer even exist) unless the shooter were superman they'd have a sprained or broken wrist.

You're arguing MoBoost just for the sake of arguing - which can be a hoot I will admit. I've been know to do that too.

But it's getting us no where and is just wasting bandwidth. You go light and fast; I'll go heavy and slow. Hopefully neither of us will ever have to test our judgement re: what works best.

They exist. And they're awesome. Totally fun to shoot the first 2 times.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom