Some people are afraid of their own shadow. They have no desire to stand up for themselves. Sometimes in life you simply cannot take the easy way.
Any sort of rebellion against the soft tyranny we now have will be undertaken by 10-30% of the population, at best. The beginnings of this nation was fraught with danger and the likelihood of failure, made all the worse by the ones who openly opposed it (and subsequently benefited from it).
I think it's far more likely that if arms are ever taken up against tyranny from within, they'll be dug up rather than pulled out of closets and safes. The hard core constitutionalists and pro-gun forces could never pull it off unless the .gov goes far too far and turns the will of a sizable majority against it. Look at the approval numbers for Congress, yet we haven't marched on the capital yet.
That's because we're patient and peaceful people. Patience is a virtue.
" . . . Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the patient Sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the Necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government . . . "
They waited until a Hard Tyranny was upon them. We should do the same.
ETA: I'm not suggesting you're for a rebellion right now, or that I read it that way. I just wanted to expand on that thought.
You read me correct. I was saying that those who would ultimately rise up will do so long after bans have turned to confiscations and confiscations have run their course. When the enemy within has become so emboldened that they risk the moral outrage of most of the populace the shovels will come out, but not before.
In visiting with friends who I thought were 2A supporters, I see that many Americans are quite content with creeping gun bans. Multiple times, I was told by others "we really don't need assault rifles", "nobody uses an assault rifle for hunting", "assault rifles are only for killing people". Even avid shooters seem perfectly willing to support a ban on semi-automatic replicas of assault rifles and normal-capacity magazines. I've heard how some would gladly exchange their wall-hangers for $50 or $100 in a mandatory buyout.
Nearly everyone will exchange their rights, liberties and freedoms for something and the promise of perceived safety is deeply appealing to most Americans. What is the 'price-point' most Americans will accept in exchange for their Second Amendment rights?
What was the final straw that started the American Revolution or the War between the states? Were the people having the same fears, feelings of distrust, anger, and betrayal that so many of us are feeling?
I say it happened on April 19, 1775.
"At about 5 a.m., 700 British troops, on a mission to capture Patriot leaders and seize a Patriot arsenal, march into Lexington to find 77 armed minutemen under Captain John Parker waiting for them on the town's common green. British Major John Pitcairn ordered the outnumbered Patriots to disperse, and after a moment's hesitation the Americans began to drift off the green. Suddenly, the "shot heard around the world" was fired from an undetermined gun, and a cloud of musket smoke soon covered the green. When the brief Battle of Lexington ended, eight Americans lay dead or dying and 10 others were wounded. Only one British soldier was injured, but the American Revolution had begun."
Keep in mind, this was five years after the Boston massacre.
I think if it comes, it will be under the guise of "reasonable" restrictions. As in, "you cannot have hi cap mags" only 10 or 8 rounders. Then ultimately there may be a restriction on military calibers as there is in Mexico and some European countries. So, you may be able to own a revolver or a 10 shot mag for your semi-auto pistol. Lots of folks would say, "we'll that's not so bad, we still can shoot, and still protect ourselves, our homes and our families." Then in a few years there will be another restriction, maybe like have to keep all rifles at a range or a limit on how much ammo you can buy.
Enter your email address to join: