I'm a big revolver fan. I carry my 642 probably 40 percent of the time, and I prefer to shoot my revolvers, both double and single actions, much more than my semi-autos.....however...
I really don't see anything in the article that justifies the use of a revolver over a semi-auto for self defense. Just about every point the article makes can be applied to the semi-auto i.e. efficient barrel length, trigger control, sight picture, etc. The article even stated the obvious...most semi-autos have a higher capacity and can be reloaded much quicker. Not one advantage was listed for the revolver...and the only two I can think of would be if you had to shoot while the gun was concealed (like in a jacket pocket) or you are carrying in bear county and you need an adult-size caliber.
I certainly don't feel outgunned when carrying a revolver, and it will probably get most people out of any self-defense situation they find themselves in, however, if given the choice between a revolver and a good semi-auto for a man vs. man defensive situation....I have to go with the semi-auto.
As much as I would love to rely on the revolver 100 percent of the time, the semi-auto simply makes more sense. Most of us carry when we're out and about, without easy access to a long gun...and in those circumstances I think it makes sense to have a gun with good capacity and easy reloads.
I haven't gotten my CCW yet, but when I do I figure I'll carry my SP101 when I choose to carry.
I guess I don't understand the constant drumbeat of "fast reloads" for semi-autos; unless you are planning on cuffing and stuffing someone, why would you need to reload? Isn't the whole premise to either protect yourself and/or others, typically long enough to incapacitate the aggressor, or buy yourself enough time to get the hell out of there? Seems to me - and I'm obviously ignorant of most of this - that if I needed to dump a 15+1 round mag, and reload for another 15 rounds, then I'm sticking around because I like a gunfight. I want to either use the weapon to put the guy on the ground, or to put him in flight or cover so I (and others) can get out of Dodge. Someone enlighten me.
I haven't gotten my CCW yet, but when I do I figure I'll carry my SP101 when I choose to carry.
I guess I don't understand the constant drumbeat of "fast reloads" for semi-autos; unless you are planning on cuffing and stuffing someone, why would you need to reload? Isn't the whole premise to either protect yourself and/or others, typically long enough to incapacitate the aggressor, or buy yourself enough time to get the hell out of there? Seems to me - and I'm obviously ignorant of most of this - that if I needed to dump a 15+1 round mag, and reload for another 15 rounds, then I'm sticking around because I like a gunfight. I want to either use the weapon to put the guy on the ground, or to put him in flight or cover so I (and others) can get out of Dodge. Someone enlighten me.
I personally am a "prepare for the worst, hope for the best" guy. I'm new to CCW, but one thing constantly on my mind when walking out of the house is the recent Muskogee mall shooting which involved multiple aggressors. Most of the time this is not the case, it is the "ideal" there's the bad, shoot a couple rounds at him and hope he dies or flies. But as gang violence grows even our beloved Oklahoma the chance of coming across a group of 2-3 guys seem possible. In that situation could hope that 5 shots is enough to kill em or scare em, but would rather be prepared in case they don't die and chose to pursue me. I respect Glock 'em Down's perspective, definitely something to keep in mind and train for. These are just my opinions, everyone lives life differently, this is how I live mine.
Speaking of J-frames, isn't this the one GED was selling - no wait, not selling just recently?
[Broken External Image]
Enter your email address to join: