Please explain how you plan to take it off line?
Would you really want a precedent for that type of action to be set?
Please explain how you plan to take it off line?
Would you really want a precedent for that type of action to be set?
I thought I was the only to note the irony.
Perhaps, when something significant happens everybody and his brother come up with theories about the event.
I can only guess what the poster meant.
Veggie, you are in to computers and you are asking this question?
Have you ever noticed web sites get attacked by hackers?
They can create denial of service, worms, viruses, a guy breaking equipment, who cares? There are so many ways.
The one thing that should have happened and didn't, was to treat this enemy just like every other enemy we face in Yemen, Pakistan, etc. We take them out. We do it every day. Sometimes we use a predator, a guided bomb, a single bullet.
The Pentagon and other government organizations get attacked every day by both individuals and governments.
Or the person he responded to, has a history of proposing and regurgitating conspiracy theories on this site.
I am familiar with him, never noticed a pattern.
Everybody has a conspiracy theory including me on the JFK. I am the only one that figured it out.
There is no such thing as absolute security, whether it be physical or data. Anything can be breached/compromised if the right person takes a crack at it.
The problem with making something foolproof is there's always a fool somewhere who happens to be smarter than you.
That was a weak attempt to answer question A, and you refused to touch question B (which is much more important).
You know, hanging traitors and spies was accepted practice in the past, I don't see any reason why that presidence chould be altered.
The question was answered, just not how you wanted for it to be answered. I don't profess to be an I.T. guru, unlike some on this board, but I've been in I.T. long enough to know that anything can be compromised when the right person is put to the task.
And, no, I wouldn't like for that kind of precedent to be set. However, there's no justification that makes it okay to put the lives of military personnel and civilians at risk.
Similar threads
