What about the dogs and cats inside?
Maybe they should file animal cruelty charges against the fireman.
That might be stretching across some thin ice.
- Status
What about the dogs and cats inside?
Maybe they should file animal cruelty charges against the fireman.
That might be stretching across some thin ice.
police are under no obligation to protect someone even if they do pay taxes.
you are reaching too far
Were they alive when the firefighters arrived?What about the dogs and cats inside?
Maybe they should file animal cruelty charges against the fireman.
That might be stretching across some thin ice.
"When Cranick's house caught fire last week, and he couldn't contain the blaze with garden hoses, he called 911. During the emergency call, he offered to pay all expenses related to the Fire Department's defense of his home, but the South Fulton firefighters refused to do anything."
They should have put out the fire and charged the man the $750 in expenses he owed. IMO
They should have put out the fire and charged the man the $750 in expenses he owed. IMO
I fear that this event, due to the publicity it received, will bring a number of law suits against the FD. The FD will be forced to change their policy of providing any fire coverage outside their area. At the end more people will suffer.
He said he would pay. Collect payment and then put the fire out.
Sounds like capitalism to me.
Services rendered for money payed.
Insurance is more socialism like.
Take money from everyone and distribute services to the ones in need.
Let's say his check bounces. Do they come back on Wednesday and set fire to the sumbitch again?
Of course not. They put a lien on his burnt trailer. That will work out well.
- Status
Similar threads
