Gay marriage

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

BadgeBunny

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 5, 2007
Messages
38,213
Reaction score
15
Location
Port Charles
Shootin says you "might be a bigot" to which K9 replies, "So an atheist cannot be against same sex unions? He/she cannot have an opinion if it disagrees with your vision of intolerance? People cannot be against something without someone calling them names like “bigot”? To paraphrase ... It is OK to be a mouth breathing moron that calls names."

Indignant: feeling or showing anger or annoyance at what is perceived as unfair treatment.

K9's reply was, literally, a textbook example of indignant.

Rotflmao! I think you project too much.
 

kahrk-9

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
494
Reaction score
25
Location
Norman
Not one single poster in this thread has offered any input on how allowing gays to marry would have a negative effect on their lives. Lots of bigots, homophobes, and closet homosexuals here on OSA.

Seeing as how we are hated by most of the 1040 window and many domestic Muslims for being what they would deem indulgent infidels, I can see where this decision by the court will cause them to hate us more, making us more susceptible to terrorism here and abroad.
 

Shootin 4 Fun

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
17,852
Reaction score
1,103
Location
Bixby
I dont get it really. If your god says to love thy neighbor, and to not judge others, why would these people doing this?

Funny ain't it? These people believe God built the world is six days, created a woman from a man's rib, can give and take life and offer an eternal after life full of pleasures and treasures, yet they don't trust him to do the judging of others. Batshit crazy if you ask me.
 

Shootin 4 Fun

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
17,852
Reaction score
1,103
Location
Bixby
Seeing as how we are hated by most of the 1040 window and many domestic Muslims for being what they would deem indulgent infidels, I can see where this decision by the court will cause them to hate us more, making us more susceptible to terrorism here and abroad.

Holy ****. We'll blame the gays.
 

Ace_on_the_Turn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
3,775
Reaction score
418
Location
OKC
Seeing as how we are hated by most of the 1040 window and many domestic Muslims for being what they would deem indulgent infidels, I can see where this decision by the court will cause them to hate us more, making us more susceptible to terrorism here and abroad.

Are you suggesting that the SCOTUS make rulings based on how the radical Muslims will react? Or that the SCOTUS should even care? Also, the 10/40 Window Muslims do not, as a majority, hate the U.S.. Most of the radical Muslims that do hate the U.S. do not hate us because of our freedoms or indulgences. They hate us because of our support of Israel.
 

nofearfactor

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
7,265
Reaction score
291
Location
cold, dark
You delight in laying down laws,
Yet you delight more in breaking them.
Like children playing by the ocean who build sand-towers with constancy and then destroy them with laughter.
But while you build your sand-towers the ocean brings more sand to the shore,
And when you destroy them the ocean laughs with you.
Verily the ocean laughs always with the innocent.


But what of those to whom life is not an ocean, and man-made laws are not sandtowers,
But to whom life is a rock, and the law a chisel with which they would carve it in their own likeness?
What of the cripple who hates dancers?
What of the ox who loves his yoke and deems the elk and deer of the forest stray and vagrant things?
What of the old serpent who cannot shed his skin, and calls all others naked and shameless?
And of him who comes early to the wedding-feast, and when over-fed and tired goes his way saying that all feasts are violation and all feasters lawbreakers?


What shall I say of these save that they too stand in the sunlight, but with their backs to the sun?
They see only their shadows, and their shadows are their laws.
And what is the sun to them but a caster of shadows?
And what is it to acknowledge the laws but to stoop down and trace their shadows upon the earth?
But you who walk facing the sun, what images drawn on the earth can hold you?
You who travel with the wind, what weather-vane shall direct your course?
What man's law shall bind you if you break your yoke but upon no man's prison door?
What laws shall you fear if you dance but stumble against no man's iron chains?
And who is he that shall bring you to judgment if you tear off your garment yet leave it in no man's path?
 

POKE1911

Sharpshooter
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
1,300
Reaction score
456
Location
Tulsa
Seeing as less than 5% of the population is gay, I don't think divorce attorneys are in for much of a windfall.

If it is 5% then there is approximately 16,000,000 in the U.S. It takes 2 to marry so 8,000,000 potential marriages. If only 50% of them marry we would currently have 4,000,000 gay-marriages. If say 30% of those end up in divorce. That would be 1,200,000 gay divorces. Average legal fees are approximately $15,000. (Some much lower and some much higher, depends on the situation, assets, and attorney hours required. Some as little as $400 others in the million.) So 1,200,000 divorces at $15,000 in legal fees leaves a pool of around $1.8 Billion in legal fees... Anyone want to go to law school with me? :)
 

kahrk-9

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
494
Reaction score
25
Location
Norman
Holy ****. We'll blame the gays.

Also, my tax dollars were used to rainbow the white house. But are you this board that you start a thread just to see how many people you can call bigots when they give you their views? 'cuz that makes you a bigot at that point... and an ass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top Bottom