CNN post fake news then retracts.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
9,794
Reaction score
12,610
Location
Owasso
CNN deletes, retracts story linking Trump and Russia
On Thursday evening, CNN investigative reporter Thomas Frank published a potentially explosive report involving an investigation of a Russian investment fund with potential ties to several associates of President Donald Trump.
But by Friday night, the story was removed from CNN’s website and all links were scrubbed from the network’s social media accounts.

“That story did not meet CNN’s editorial standards and has been retracted,” CNN said in an editors note posted in place of the story. “Links to the story have been disabled.”

Neither Frank or CNN immediately responded to requests for comment, and a spokesperson for the Senate Intelligence Committee wasn’t available to comment.

Frank, a Pulitzer Prize-nominated journalist, had reported that the Senate Intelligence Committee was investigating a “$10-billion Russian investment fund whose chief executive met with a member of President Donald Trump’s transition team four days before Trump’s inauguration.”

In addition to retracting its story, CNN also apologized to Anthony Scaramucci, an adviser to Trump during the presidential campaign and a member of his transition team’s executive committee, who was mentioned in the story as having met Kirill Dmitriev, the head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) that the network said is overseen by Vnesheconombank, a state-run bank that is currently under U.S. sanctions.

According to the report, the meeting between Scarmucci and Dmitriev could have included the issue of sanctions being lifted, but a spokesperson for the RDIF told Sputnik News, a state-run Russian news channel, that the fund is not a part of Vnesheconombank.

“RDIF always operates in full compliance with relevant regulations and legislation and its operations do not violate sanctions,” the spokesperson said.

Multiple news outlets have reported on the meeting, which took place at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland just four days before Trump’s inauguration. As Bloomberg noted, it was “the first public contact between the incoming administration and Kremlin-backed business.”

Scaramucci weighed in on Twitter Saturday morning about the network’s decision to pull the story, calling it a “classy move.”
 

TerryMiller

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
19,899
Reaction score
20,754
Location
Here, but occasionally There.
I understand that a somewhat recent study of the coverage of news outlets showed that CNN's coverage of Trump was roughly 93% negative. I need to find that to see just how many of their news stories were in that study, and how many stories there were overall in that time period.

If the other news media outlets are having similar results, it is no wonder that Trump's poll numbers show to be bad. It seems obvious that the news media that is so strongly against Trump may actually be "activist" media instead of "objective" media.
 

Dale00

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
7,570
Reaction score
4,149
Location
Oklahoma
I'd be happy if they just shut down major media news narrowcast programs for the public schools. As long as future voters are being passively convinced that major media is truthful, we have a problem.
 

deerwhacker444

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
3,439
Reaction score
2,387
Location
OK
Is anyone investigating why CNN is so desperate to defame Trump? Do they have an economic interest in doing so, or is it pure ideological and political opposition?
It's a personal feud between Trump and Zucker. Trump called out CNN and Zucker by name, earlier for Fake news. Since then, CNN has made it their mission to ruin Trump.
 

Pokinfun

The Most Interesting Man in the World
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
3,756
Reaction score
1,507
Location
Southern
I understand that a somewhat recent study of the coverage of news outlets showed that CNN's coverage of Trump was roughly 93% negative. I need to find that to see just how many of their news stories were in that study, and how many stories there were overall in that time period.

If the other news media outlets are having similar results, it is no wonder that Trump's poll numbers show to be bad. It seems obvious that the news media that is so strongly against Trump may actually be "activist" media instead of "objective" media.
the media has become a political party.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom