Constutional carry law

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
3,069
Location
East of Tulsa
Any one know of a "Finished" version posted anywhere? Yes I realize this is what was proposed and passed with the previous link, but having a "discussion" with a friend and can not find something totally Finalized and put out by OSBI in their site as to the real deal. Yep, in addition I know a .22 revolver unloaded and locked in your trunk is not legal to drive into the Post Office property at 3AM and drop a letter in their drop box, but looking for the finished product of the Nov 1st OSD, (Constitutional Carry) to show him in B/W. Tks
 

Aries

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
5,720
Reaction score
8,518
Location
Sapulpa
osbi is still showing the 2018 version, which I find to be kind of bizarre that they haven't updated yet. I sent an email, will report if/when I get an answer.
 

KOPBET

Duck of Death
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
13,841
Reaction score
10,647
Location
N36º11.90´ W95º53.29´
Any one know of a "Finished" version posted anywhere? Yes I realize this is what was proposed and passed with the previous link, but having a "discussion" with a friend and can not find something totally Finalized and put out by OSBI in their site as to the real deal. Yep, in addition I know a .22 revolver unloaded and locked in your trunk is not legal to drive into the Post Office property at 3AM and drop a letter in their drop box, but looking for the finished product of the Nov 1st OSD, (Constitutional Carry) to show him in B/W. Tks

That is the finished "enrolled" version.
 

HeyEng

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
335
Reaction score
442
Location
OK
osbi is still showing the 2018 version, which I find to be kind of bizarre that they haven't updated yet. I sent an email, will report if/when I get an answer.
They don't want to let people know the facts, so they try and obfuscate their responsibilities under the law.
 

jakeman

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
4,596
Reaction score
6,689
Location
Blanchard, America
They don't want to let people know the facts, so they try and obfuscate their responsibilities under the law.


1289.13A seems to contradict 1289.7 and 1289.13.

1289.7 & 1289.13 are incredibly clear in their intent and meaning.

1289.13A seems to directly contradict both of them.

Can one of you legal scholars please explain?



edited - for clarity.
 
Last edited:

HeyEng

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
335
Reaction score
442
Location
OK
1289.13 and 1289.13A seem to contradict one another.

1289.13 is incredibly clear in it's intent and meaning.

1289.13A seems to directly contradict 289.13.

Can one of you legal scholars please explain?
I will take a gander in a bit. Wife is "demanding" that we go run errands...so you know how that goes! :)
 

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,335
Reaction score
4,324
Location
OKC area
13A means that if you are carrying under permitless carry and commit a traffic violation that causes you to be pulled over, you will face an additional fine because you were driving like an idiot and essentially improperly transporting that firearm.

You aren’t getting fined just for having the firearm, but for being in possession of one while breaking traffic laws. So it doesn’t contradict .7 or .13, it adds to them.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom