Do you like airplanes !!!

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

HeyEng

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
335
Reaction score
442
Location
OK
The Beech Starship broke ground for many things in aviation. First certificated composite aircraft, first glass panel, to mention a few. I believe Beech lost a lot of money on the Starship and became concerned about a few issues they had with it and management decided to buy back all of them and scrap them. They got most but several people with money decided to keep theirs. I think Beech tried to sue a couple but gave up. There is no parts etc available form Beech. The Avanti is successful but not a lot of demand in the USA. There was one based at Wiley Post but I don't know if it's still there. I moved to Page a few years ago and don't go there much any more.

Here's a cool article about them and a good video too.

https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2017/march/pilot/turbine-beech-starship
 

Snattlerake

Conservitum Americum
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
20,686
Reaction score
32,250
Location
OKC
I used to watch them take off and land every month at this airport just to take them out and exercise them. I went with him once. Really nice inside and very very quiet.

This guy flies them regularly.
 

RickN

Eye Bleach Salesman
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
25,474
Reaction score
34,422
Location
Edmond
Ah, yes! The 'push me, pull you!'


Also known as the Suck and Blow. If I ever got rich and became a pilot, it is the plane I would buy. Supposedly takes off, flies, and lands better on one engine than almost any other multi-engine aircraft. With my luck I really need that. :P
 

Snattlerake

Conservitum Americum
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
20,686
Reaction score
32,250
Location
OKC
It's called maintenance for a reason

G474GWFbHDywXSkFZKoDqvxFZhuqDCL5bWWjlRX1gvw.png
 

chuter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
5,322
Reaction score
7,741
Location
over yonder
Yea I think I'll stay away from those. Wife and I were out at Page a few years ago running our dogs when I heard one fire up on the other side of the hangers. Could not believe he was trying to fly, wind was 35 + gusting 55+. Saw him over hanger fighting the wind was losing ground and going backwards. Next thing he turned downwind and turned over the top of us and he was fighting it hard. Gyro started flopping around and he hit the ground tumbling. Rotor hit him in back of helmet and shoulder, I don't think there was a bone not broken including neck, back, shoulders, arms, legs. He was dead instantly I believe. Wasn't anything I could do for him. What was really sad was his occupation. Helicopter crash investigator for the FAA!

I knew that guy. I'd say blame poor aviation decision making, not the aircraft.
There's a long standing debate in the gyro world about the need for a horizontal stabilizer; he had one on his, then he took it off, and then he crashed.
Can't say for sure that's what caused it, but I'd say it didn't help.
Plus flying in insane wind conditions.

He liked to push the envelope, he found the edge.
Died doing what he loved I guess.
 

skyhawk1

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
1,634
Reaction score
1,470
Location
Piedmont
I knew that guy. I'd say blame poor aviation decision making, not the aircraft.
There's a long standing debate in the gyro world about the need for a horizontal stabilizer; he had one on his, then he took it off, and then he crashed.
Can't say for sure that's what caused it, but I'd say it didn't help.
Plus flying in insane wind conditions.

He liked to push the envelope, he found the edge.
Died doing what he loved I guess.

Yes poor decision making for sure. Was told later he had removed something form the rear of the gyrocopter trying to get more speed out of it but in effect made it more unstable and with the wind that day ;(

NTSB Factual Report
HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On February 18, 2007, about 1620 central standard time, a Stevens KB-2 single-engine gyroplane, N6KT, was substantially damaged when it collided with terrain while on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern at the Clarence E Page Municipal Airport (F29), near Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The commercial pilot, the sole occupant, sustained fatal injuries. The gyroplane was registered to and operated by the pilot. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The local flight originated approximately 1555.

According to witnesses at the airport, the pilot initially departed runway 17L and completed one circuit around the traffic pattern. While approaching the north end of runway 17L the pilot appeared to "hover" into the wind and performed several "rudder turns." The pilot then proceeded to perform a touch-and-go maneuver and started around the traffic pattern a second time. The witnesses further reported that while on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern, the gyroplane appeared to fly straight and level at an estimated altitude of 100-150 feet above ground level (agl). About half way along the downwind leg of the traffic patern, the gyroplane suddenly pitched to a nose down attitude and subsequently impacted the ground. One witness reported that the gyroplane descended with an approximate nose down angle of 60 degrees "while rolling left and right."

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

The pilot, age 46, held an airline transport pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land, multi engine land and rotorcraft helicopter. The pilot also held a commercial pilot certificate for airplane single engine sea and rotorcraft gyroplane. In addition, the pilot held a certified flight instructor certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land, multi-engine land, rotorcraft, rotorcraft gyroplane, instrument airplane, and instrument rotorcraft. His last Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) second-class medical was issued on October 2, 2006, with the limitation of "MUST WEAR CORRECTIVE LENSES."

An examination of the pilot's logbook indicated an estimated total flight time of 12,251 hours; of which 160 hours were in gyroplanes. The pilot logged 15 hours in the last 30 days of which 3 hours were in gyroplanes. His last noted flight review was completed January 12, 2007.

AIRPLANE INFORMATION

The 2004-model Stevens KB-2, serial number 001, was a amateur built single engine gyroplane, configured for one occupant. The gyroplane was powered by an air-cooled, normally aspirated, direct drive, horizontally opposed, carbureted, four-cylinder engine. The engine was a Great Plains 1835, rated at 60 horsepower at 3,400 rpm, and was driving a two-bladed fixed pitch Tennessee wooden propeller.

According to the combined airframe and engine logbook, the gyroplane's most recent annual condition inspection was completed on November 26, 2006, with an airframe total time of 140 hours. At the time of the accident, the airframe and engine had accumulated approximately 142 hours and 2 hours since the last inspection.

METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION

At 1552, the weather observation facility at the Will Rogers World Airport (OKC), near Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, located 12 nautical miles southeast from the site of the accident was reporting, wind from 190 degrees at 21 knots gusting to 24 knots, visibility 10 statute miles, few clouds at 20,000 feet, temperature 60 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 25 degrees Fahrenheit, and a barometric pressure setting of 30.11 inches of Mercury.

AIRPORT INFORMATION

Clarence E Page Municipal Airport (F29), was a non towered airport operating under class E classification airspace. The field elevation was 1,353 feet mean sea level (msl). Runway 17L was a 3,502-foot-long by 75-foot-wide concrete runway.

WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION

The wreckage was located in a grassy area adjacent to an asphalt road approximately 250 feet east of a group of deciduous trees and a row of aircraft hangars. The debris field encompassed an area about 80-feet long and approximately 20-feet wide, on a magnetic heading of 335 degrees. Ground scars were consistent with the gyroplane impacting the ground while in a tail low and inverted position. All major components of the gyroplane were accounted for at the accident site with the exception of the horizontal stabilizer. The horizontal stabilizer was later located in the pilot's hangar.

The gyroplane was found fractured in seven separate sections. The sections were as follows: forward airframe including the front wheel and instrument console, center airframe section with the lower mast and about three fourths of the landing gear with right wheel attached, aft airframe with vertical stabilizer and rudder partially attached, fuel tank/seat and upper mast, remainder of the landing gear with left wheel attached, engine with propeller hub, and the rotor head with attached rotor blades. Continuity was established from the rudder pedals to the rudder and from the cyclic stick to the rotor.

One main rotor blade exhibited trailing edge compressions and a gradual downward bend and the other blade remained nearly straight with little damage. Both blades remained attached to the hub, but separated from the mast.

The gyroplane's seat doubled as a fuel tank. Although the fuel tank was found compromised, it contained a blue liquid consistent with 100 low lead aviation fuel.

The engine was suspended from a lift, and the spark plugs and valve covers were removed. Investigators manually rotated the engine via the propeller hub. Valve train continuity was established to each cylinder and thumb compression was established. The spark plug electrodes were light grey in color and did not contain lead deposits. Due to impact damage, spark could not be established from the engine's ignition system. The propeller hub remained attached to the engine crankshaft flange. Both of the wooden propeller blades were found splintered and spread throughout the wreckage site.

The examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of preimpact mechanical failure/malfunction.

MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION

According to the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, the cause of death was blunt force trauma.

The FAA's Civil Aerospace Medical Institute performed forensic toxicology on specimens from the pilot and no drugs of abuse were detected.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

According to FAA publication, Rotorcraft Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-21), "A power pushover can occur on some gyroplanes that have the propeller thrust line above the center of gravity and do not have an adequate horizontal stabilizer." The handbook further states, "an adequate horizontal stabilizer slows the pitching rate and allows time for recovery."

Investigators were able to establish that this was the pilot's first flight since removing the gyroplane's horizontal stabilizer.





NTSB Probable Cause
The pilot's failure to maintain control of the gyroplane while in the traffic pattern. Contributing to the accident was the high wind with terrain induced turbulence and the absence of the gyroplane's horizontal stabilizer.
 

p238shooter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
3,681
Reaction score
2,878
Location
East of Tulsa
I love anything aviation, I grew up a normal poor kid, had what I needed, not a lot more. We lived very close to the north ind of the runway at Tulsa International. Guess planes and aviation got into my bloodstream. 60 years later, lots of hard work and lots of luck being in the right place at the right time I have been very fortunate in life. I own a Zenith 801 STOL and a Piper Cherokee 235. Unfortunately my age is getting up there, and I am realizing my flying days are limited. I will fly as long as I am safe, but I know I will have to hang it up some day. I never walk outside without looking up, you never know what you might miss.
 

Engineman1960

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
845
Reaction score
776
Location
Broken Arrow
August of 2018 I went to the Pima Air and Space Museum, In Tucson, AZ; Among the displays are the SR-71, Beech Starship and the Cessna O-2 -- they have 3 B-52’s. Also did the bus tour of the Boneyard.
https://pimaair.org

Pima has a B-29; According to the Volunteers at Pima, the oldest crew member was 22 years old.

I spent 2 days there, still wasn’t enough time -- August in Tucson -- Very Hot !!!!

25 miles south of Tucson is the Titan Missile Museum, you actually get to do a walk thru of the Command and Launch facility!
https://titanmissilemuseum.org
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom