Floridas new Red flag law

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
3,023
Location
Blanchard
Now the people can be disarmed by any psychiatrist who is an anti-gun advocate who can put anything into a patients medical record regardless if it’s true or not and the court will support it.
 
Last edited:

NikatKimber

Sharpshooter
Staff Member
Special Hen Moderator
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
20,793
Reaction score
1,520
Location
Claremore
Like @dlmcm said, mental issues are a big problem. One way or the other, as a country we are going to have to deal with that.

My problem with this law, is that there is no representation. They issue this like a warrant from the sound of it, with no chance for the "victim" of the law to represent his side of the case.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,526
Reaction score
5,673
Location
Kingfisher County
Do the victims of natural selection and attrition have constitutional rights?
Yup. They have rights protected by the Constitution just like victims of the crimes committed by those destined to be victims of natural selection and attrition. If a person does not wish to become a victim of someone's right to self defense(the natural selection process), that person only need not put someone else's life in jeopardy so they don't get shot in self defense and thereby not contribute to the reduced number of criminals(the attrition aspect).

In an armed and polite society, if you put someone else's life I jeopardy, you put your life in jeopardy as well by the likely act of self defense by your intended victim. If your intended victim fails, you then face the rest of society in court and a likely death sentence.

Woody
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
10,138
Reaction score
15,364
Location
Oklahoma City
Well and good, but...The mentally unstable individual takes his new, shiny AR-15 out of the closet, and steps into the school down the street. Those teachers and students have rights that are being infringed by the individual whose guns were not taken away because he has 2A rights. It just isn't as easy as saying "shall not be infringed". If we support and defend the Constitution, we have to support and defend the entire Constitution. The "gun problem" in USA is because there have been those who have taken advantage, either intentionally or unintentionally, of the freedom and easy access to firearms.

I don't have a solution, but ignoring the issue and saying that 2A is supreme over all is not a solution either.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom