That sounds good on the surface, but the victim likely can't afford the legal representation GB can. (This same "out-lawyering" is how corporations outlast workmen's comp, etc...)These situations wouldn't arise near as often if a law were put into place that the accuser must pay the amount that they are seeking from the accused, if the accused are found innocent. If she's seeking 35 million for instance from Garth, and Garth is found innocent, she owes Garth 35 million. This would benefit both sides greatly.