Gun owner leaves a gun in his locked vehicle at his residence and you blame the owner when some thug breaks in and steals it.
Why do you consider them not at fault when the home is broken into?
Gun owner leaves a gun in his locked vehicle at his residence and you blame the owner when some thug breaks in and steals it.
Why do you consider them not at fault when the home is broken into?
I use a Handgun Safe brand in my vehicle. It's made of steel plate not sheet matal and I have it bolted all the way thru the body. I don't think many scum bags would have the tools and time to break into this one.
Last edited:
Unfortunately, I no longer have any guns...
I use a Handgun Safe brand in my vehicle. It's made of steel plate not sheet matal and I have it bolted all the way thru the body. I don't think many scum bags would have the tools and time to break into this one.
30 seconds with a screw driver and a hammer will get into that.
Most tweekers are gonna smash and grab, not hang around to fiddle with that.
It would be helpful to know more about the particular cases of firearms stolen from vehicles. I certainly feel that leaving guns in vehicles for anything other than temporary storage is a mistake. Adding layers of security is certainly a good idea if you must leave a firearm inside a vehicle. Glove boxes, center consoles and door pockets are going to be the first places checked by thieves going through a vehicle.
You watch Lockpickinglawyer too?
That channel has me like WTF.... what's the point lol.
Just a guess (based on an opinion only) that most of the vehicles effected also have some sort of sticker advertising what brand of firearm they adore.
Or they were left in plain sight and/or unlocked vehicles.
But why make it easier for the S.O.B.s to carry out their evil plans?
