Here it is, folks, and it is bad news: Obama’s Official Proposed Gun Ban List

[cmhbob]

Clarification from Alan Korwin:

CLARIFICATION

Author Alan Korwin
as drawn by Pulitzer-prize-winning cartoonist Steve Benson
http://www.gunlaws.com

I did not write this:

----
Obama's Gun Ban List Is Out

Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is
always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to
impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a
brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you
own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in
the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that
for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know
that you did.

Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the
citizens.
----


Where did that email come from?
A lot of people apparently got it before someone sent me a copy.
I'd like to write to whoever decided to create and circulate it.
I finally got it in this link from someone:

http://americannationalmilitia.com/obamas-gun-ban-list-is-out

I did not write that inflammatory paragraph and its next sentence,
even though someone has attributed that to me.


HOWEVER:

I did indeed post, in January 2009, the huge list of guns to be banned
that came with it -- which I took directly from a Democrat's proposed bill,
HR 1022, in the 110th Congress. That list is accurate (as I saw it in the
link above, and as it remains posted on my website), including the blanket
powers to be granted to the Attorney General, amounting to an
extraordinarily broad firearms ban.

[Rifles (or copies or duplicates): M1 Carbine, Sturm Ruger Mini-14, AR-15,
Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, AR-10, Thompson 1927, Thompson M1; AK, AKM,
AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90, NHM 90, NHM 91... <snip> the list goes on at
great length, including shotguns, handguns, gear, parts and much more, go
to the link for the whole list]

That part is not invented. It was from Congress. In 2009.
To everyone who wrote to me asking for the source, there it is.

No one, including the Democrats, expected that to have a chance of passage
at the time,
under President Bush. It simply showed what they wished for, and they
introduced it into Congress.

It is horrifying from a gun-rights perspective.

My original posting is here, including the list of guns to be banned, and
you can read it:
http://www.gunlaws.com/GunLawUpdate3.htm.
If you own a gun, chances are yours is included, because along with the
specific lists,
are features guns have, like grips (you read that right), and anything the
AG might decide to add.

The Brady Gun-Ban Strategy, issued at the same time at the beginning of
Obama's first term, is here:
http://www.gunlaws.com/BradyStrategy2009.htm
It did not circulate very far outside their own circles.
The lamestream media basically ignored it because it was so incendiary.

This is why the left was so disappointed with Obama's performance:
he failed to act on their astounding rights-removal plans.
Their respect for the fundamental civil and human right to arms is lower
than you can imagine.

Now, as far as I'm aware, no one outside his inner circle has seen his
current plans.

Saying "Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out" -- and attributing that to me, is
false.

I would sure like to know who did that.

But the list of guns is real, it was proposed in Congress almost four
years ago.

Who knows what they're planning now. Wait and see.
I doubt it will be good, if your rights mean anything.

As before, I'll be watching, and will continue to post these things as I
find them.

I read the bills, and describe them in plain English. I get other insider
info.

I have the UN Arms Trade Treaty spelled out in my reports 113, 114 and
116, here:
http://www.gunlaws.com/PageNineIndex.htm
113- How treaties can trump the Constitution; 114- The treaty spelled out
in plain English;
116- Mexico's plan to use it against us, from our pro-rights Ambassador
Donald Mahley

Get on my list on my home page -- http://www.gunlaws.com

Alan.

///////////////////////////

 

[10Seconds]

This is what gets me - so many people, self claimed gun enthusiasts on this site included, want to act like this isnt a threat to our rights. You want to make fun and call us tin hat or whatever is your favored term of the day if we take the threat seriously.

Whether this text is it or not I cant say, but I can tell you that some sort of firearms legislation will definitely be on the agenda within the next four years. And anyone who tells you otherwise is fooling themselves.

If the gun community is divided against itself, then I am afraid that we really dont stand a chance of saving our rights.

 

[ignerntbend]

Whether this text is it or not I cant say, but I can tell you that some sort of firearms legislation will definitely be on the agenda within the next four years. And anyone who tells you otherwise is fooling themselves.
.

The old, "it might as well be true even though it isn't", argument.

 

[poopgiggle]

This is what gets me - so many people, self claimed gun enthusiasts on this site included, want to act like this isnt a threat to our rights. You want to make fun and call us tin hat or whatever is your favored term of the day if we take the threat seriously.

I'm making fun of you because if you think that this is actually a credible threat, you lack basic knowledge about how government works and the current politics surrounding the issue of gun control.

No one's saying that we shouldn't be vigilant, but we need to quit flipping our collective sh*t every time some legislator from NY or California who has a hard-on for high capacity assault clips opens their mouth. Same goes for when the NRA/Internet/Tinfoil Hatters Anonymous comes up with some scaremongering conspiracy theory like THE UN GUN BAN TREATY THAT OBUMMER IS USING TO CIRCUMVENT THE CONSTITUTION.

Am I the only one who heard "the boy who cried wolf" when he was little?

 

[jfssms]

Hi Bob,

It does not matter what Tim wrote, so long as people remember the end game, A TOTAL GUN BAN.

These wizards of smart ( the 535+2 ) have been trying to destroying our right to keep and bear arms for over 100 years now.

Someone one on this board has said ( Fire Them All ) I wish there was a Like Button.

 

[Werewolf]

and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us.

That article's credibility dropped below ZERO when I read that.

The DEMS don't have the votes to pass such a thing now. Who knows what the future will bring but they don't have the votes now.

Besides; the 110th Congress was in session 2007-2009. I remember that bill. It went nowhere fast. The same will happen if it is placed on the docket again.

Executive order??? Someone explain how the Obamanation could unilaterally and legally ban all those guns with an executive order.

 

[jcizzle]

uhhh. telescoping stocks, pistol grips and pistols with mags holding more than 10 rounds. that includes every gun i own.

 

[david04]

This is what gets me - so many people, self claimed gun enthusiasts on this site included, want to act like this isnt a threat to our rights. You want to make fun and call us tin hat or whatever is your favored term of the day if we take the threat seriously.

Whether this text is it or not I cant say, but I can tell you that some sort of firearms legislation will definitely be on the agenda within the next four years. And anyone who tells you otherwise is fooling themselves.

If the gun community is divided against itself, then I am afraid that we really dont stand a chance of saving our rights.

Yes, gun bans are almost certainly on the agenda; but probably not from the Congress. I don't worry too much about Dianne Feinstein or Chuck Schumer or any other knucklehead in the senate because they can't get anything passed with the republican controlled house. BUT, where we DO have to worry is Obama doing things by executive order, or through regulations. He might find some way to make ammo very difficult to get, or find a way to ban certain guns without going through congress. ALSO, (this is my biggest worry) if one of the conservative supreme court justices decides to retire, Obama will get to nominate the replacement, and it will tip the balance of the court away from gun rights (and lots of other things as well) for many years. It won't take long for cases to appear which will severely undermine our 2nd amendment rights. Then it won't matter who is president or in congress, we'll be fighting an uphill battle for a long time. I just hope Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia can hang on till the next president. All in all, it doesn't look good from here...

 

[jfssms]

The old, "it might as well be true even though it isn't", argument.

I know you like history, our right to keep and bear arms has been under assault for your entire life.

check it out.

 

[ignerntbend]

So what you view as the spirit of the truth in a made-up story, is more important than the actual truth? The information in the OP?