Ok let me spell it out for you, show me an unedited video where the union guys walk up and just start tearing the tent down. You don't have one. These people could have done any number of things to get to where that video starts. They spin it to your liking and there you go, "union thugs tearing up our poor little tent, we where just standing around not causing any trouble and they just bullied us."
So, SHOW ME unedited video, PLEASE! I'm not gonna take yours or anyone else's word OR there EDITED VIDEO. If there is nothing to hide why is it edited, did they(pro-rtw) start something, or was the unions unprovoked? We don't know because the video only shows the ending....
So there you have it spelled out, you like it as long as it shows your side, but you may not like it if they showed how it got to that. You poke a dog with a stick enough and they will bite...
You have totally missed the boat on this one. I have not taken a side one way or the other in this thread. I am not defending or advocating for either side.
I think it is funny that you would not just answer the hypothetical question and instead went on the defensive crying about edited this or, what about that. What happened or didnt happen in the video is immaterial to the question, which was asked to find out what you thought justified a physical response. Instead you have gone on this diatribe about how stupid I must be that you have to spell it out, and then you say the same dang thing all over again with capitol letters.
Anyway, i retract the question and dismiss the witness.