New OSBI SDA Report.

[257wby]

Some of the counties had more approvals than they had applications. I wonder who got those permits??

I was wondering that as well. Alfalfa is my home county and it was one of those with more approvals that applications. The only thing I can see is if someone applied say December 2008 and were approved after the first of the year.

 

[LightningCrash]

I was wondering that as well. Alfalfa is my home county and it was one of those with more approvals that applications. The only thing I can see is if someone applied say December 2008 and were approved after the first of the year.

Maybe those were the applications from November 5th 2008

lol

 

[Roadking Larry]

Some of the counties had more approvals than they had applications. I wonder who got those permits??

Left overs from the previous year. If someone submitts in December it likely won't be approved till the next year. The numbers for subbmissions and approvals would be different.

This is good info to remember when talking to our elected reps aboun t SDA issues. It shows that people can carry firearms responsibly.

 

[skyydiver]

It would be interesting to see the details behind the suspensions and revocations of the licenses.

I think 3 were revoked for "improper putting of one into the hip."

I am SO sorry Larry.

 

[TerryMiller]

Actually, it is 0.16% - Still a very small percent.

Recalculate.

.0016 is correct.

.16% would have been over 5750 suspended or revoked.

 

[skyydiver]

Recalculate.

.0016 is correct.

.16% would have been over 5750 suspended or revoked.

The two numbers you posted are identical.

.0016 = .16%

 

[jeffsoward]

The two numbers you posted are identical.

.0016 = .16%

tenths
hundredths
thousandths

not the same number.

c'mon, fourth grade math.

 

[oneshotonekill]

tenths
hundredths
thousandths

not the same number.

c'mon, fourth grade math.

One has a % sign therefore they are the same number 100/100=1 1x100%=100%
.0016x100%=.16%

If both numbers were intended to be %s then the above is not true.

The number in question is 14+44=58 suspended or revoked
58/35962=.0016
.0016x100%=.16%

There I believe that is all correct, but I did go to public schools

 

[jbarnett]

I think 3 were revoked for "improper putting of one into the hip."

I am SO sorry Larry.

That never gets old.

 

[jeffsoward]

One has a % sign therefore they are the same number 100/100=1 1x100%=100%
.0016x100%=.16%

If both numbers were intended to be %s then the above is not true.

The number in question is 14+44=58 suspended or revoked
58/35962=.0016
.0016x100%=.16%

There I believe that is all correct, but I did go to public schools

Excuse me, but RKLarry originally said ".0016%"
I was going with the assumption everyone was talking about the original .0016% (0.57 and change out of 35962) vs. the .16% (57 and change out of 35962)

I understand the reality of the values, I was arguing RKL's original number vs the argument assuming percentage.