Obama announces restrictions on distribution of military-style equipment to police

[Dave70968]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-style-equipment-to-police/?intcmp=latestnews

WASHINGTON – President Obama is banning local police departments from receiving a range of military-style equipment from the federal government -- from grenade launchers to bayonets to certain armored vehicles -- as he implements the recommendations of a panel that examined the controversial gear giveaways in the wake of the Ferguson riots.

The White House announced Monday that Washington would no longer provide some military-style gear while putting stricter controls on other weapons and equipment distributed to law enforcement. The details were released in advance of an Obama visit to Camden, N.J., Monday afternoon where he met with youth and law enforcement.

Nine months earlier, scenes of heavily armed police in riot gear dispelling racially charged protests in Ferguson touched off a debate about federal programs that let local law enforcement apply for such equipment. The White House initially suggested Obama would maintain those programs, but an interagency group found "substantial risk of misusing or overusing" items like tracked armored vehicles, high-powered firearms and camouflage could undermine trust in police.

Speaking in Camden, Obama said the use of militarized gear by police can give the public the feeling that law enforcement is like "an occupying force."

In previewing the president's trip, the White House said that effective immediately, the federal government will no longer fund or provide armored vehicles that run on a tracked system instead of wheels, weaponized aircraft or vehicles, firearms or ammunition of .50-caliber or higher, grenade launchers, bayonets or camouflage uniforms. The federal government also is exploring ways to recall prohibited equipment already distributed.

With scrutiny on police only increasing in the ensuing months after a series of highly publicized deaths of black suspects nationwide, Obama also is unveiling the final report of a task force he created to help build confidence between police and minority communities in particular.

In addition to the new equipment-transfer bans, a longer list of equipment the federal government provides will come under tighter control, including wheeled armored vehicles like Humvees, manned aircraft, drones, specialized firearms, explosives, battering rams and riot batons, helmets and shields. Starting in October, police will have to get approval from their city council, mayor or some other local governing body to obtain it, provide a persuasive explanation of why it is needed and have more training and data collection on the use of the equipment.

The issue of police militarization rose to prominence last year after a white police officer in Ferguson fatally shot unarmed black 18-year-old Michael Brown, sparking protests. Critics questioned why police in full body armor with armored trucks responded to dispel demonstrators, and Obama seemed to sympathize when ordering a review of the programs that provide the equipment. "There is a big difference between our military and our local law enforcement and we don't want those lines blurred," Obama last in August.

But he did not announce a ban in December with the publication of the review, which showed five federal agencies spent $18 billion on programs that provided equipment including 92,442 small arms, 44,275 night-vision devices, 5,235 Humvees, 617 mine-resistant vehicles and 616 aircraft. At the time, the White House defended the programs as proving to be useful in many cases, such as the response to the Boston Marathon bombing. Instead of repealing the programs, Obama issued an executive order that required federal agencies that run the programs to consult with law enforcement and civil rights and civil liberties organizations to recommend changes that make sure they are accountable and transparent.

That working group said in a report out Monday that it developed the list of newly banned equipment because "the substantial risk of misusing or overusing these items, which are seen as militaristic in nature, could significantly undermine community trust and may encourage tactics and behaviors that are inconsistent with the premise of civilian law enforcement." The Justice Department did not respond to an inquiry about how many pieces of equipment that are now banned had been previously distributed through federal programs.

The separate report from the 21st Century Policing task force has a long list of recommendations to improve trust in police, including encouraging more transparency about interactions with the public. The White House said 21 police agencies nationwide, including Camden and nearby Philadelphia, have agreed to start putting out never-before released data on citizen interactions like use of force, stops, citations and officer-involved shootings. The administration also is launching an online toolkit to encourage the use of body cameras to record police interactions. And the Justice Department is giving $163 million in grants to incentivize police departments to adopt the report's recommendations.

Ron Davis, director of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services at the Department of Justice, told reporters he hoped the report could be a "key transformational document" in rebuilding trust that has been destroyed in recent years between police and minority communities.

"We are without a doubt sitting at a defining moment for American policing," said Davis, a 30-year police veteran and former chief of the East Palo Alto (California) Police Department. "We have a unique opportunity to redefine policing in our democracy, to ensure that public safety becomes more than the absence of crime, that it must also include the presence of justice."

'Bout time.

 

[Shootin 4 Fun]

Good. Our law enforcement departments do not need to be equipped the same as our military.

 

[1krr]

Good. Our law enforcement departments do not need to be equipped the same as our military.

Totally agree. As much as our politicians have tried to make us the world's police, they have totally different missions and totally different needs. Generally speaking, well marked and public focused policing is orders of magnitude more useful in fullfilling the job of preventing crime than undercover traffic enforcement with unmarked cars and guys that look better setup to raid an ISIS compound that to write a soccer mom a speeding ticket. 1995 was better than 2011...

Although this is really damn cool and I would rock it:

 

[Foghorn]

I can't believe people are falling for this.... nothing really changed.

This was no loss to Leo's nor win for society.

Nothing screams poor craftsmanship like wrinkles in your duct tape

 

[LightningCrash]

Good. Our law enforcement departments do not need to be equipped the same as our military.

Police and citizens shouldn't be allowed to have dangerous weapons.

 

[HoLeChit]

I think that this is a good thing, however I do feel strongly about the police evolving as crime does. Greater technology and threats from criminals means a better equipped policing force. The best way to negate an armed threat is to counter it with greater force. BUT this MRAP and crew serve weapons and drones business is not only unnecessary, but a waste of money and time. Stick with the ol trusty sidearm, with the patrol carbine and shotty in the car if the need arises. I'm glad that we are trying to get this stuff under control.

 

[Raoul Duke]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-style-equipment-to-police/?intcmp=latestnews

'Bout time.

^^^I'm OK with this^^^

Obama should issue an executive order making LEO's disclose their Stingray possession and usage, too.

 

[Permanent37]

Shout out to Rand Paul for getting the ball rolling on demilitarizing the police.

 

[dennishoddy]

Police and citizens shouldn't be allowed to have dangerous weapons.

I agree, only criminals should be allowed to have them.

 

[dennishoddy]

Shout out to Rand Paul for getting the ball rolling on demilitarizing the police.

How did Rand get this going? It would be a great feather in his cap if its documented.